CCA 200949042: Local rules govern post-petition levy procedures in Chapter 13 cases
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel Advice addresses the collection of post-petition tax liabilities in Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases. If the plan does not provide for the liability, the IRS may generally collect from assets not dedicated to the plan, including through a levy, subject to exempt wage amounts and local rules or standing orders. A wage levy must reach only wages exceeding the debtor's trustee payments when future earnings fund the plan, and pre-levy notice may be required. The advice cautions that the automatic stay may prohibit some collection actions and states that local rules control which levy procedures may be used, so the relevant Counsel office should coordinate advice for Florida.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Which procedures may the IRS use to collect post-petition tax liabilities from Chapter 13 debtors?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: Bankruptcy Code Chapter 13; IRM 5.9.10.9(5), IRM 5.9.10.9(6), and IRM 5.9.3.7
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA-713346-09 Number: 200949042
Release Date: 12/4/2009
Office: ---------
UILC: 9115.12-00
From: ---------------------
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 3:47 PM
To: -----------------------
Cc: ----------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: Post Petition Liabilities in Chapter 13 cases
In response to your question about differing procedures between two Insolvency offices with respect to the treatment of post-petition liabilities in Chapter 13 cases:
IRM 5.9.10.9(6) states:
(6) Postpetition Levy Action. In a Chapter 13 case, if the plan does not provide for payment of a postpetition tax liability, generally the postpetition liabilities can be collected (including by use of levy action) from any asset not dedicated to the plan. In addition to monies required to fund the plan, the debtor is entitled to receive the exempt amounts from a wage levy accorded to taxpayers under the IRC. Further, Insolvency must follow local rules or standing orders impacting this position.
a. If wages and future earnings of the debtor are designated to fund the plan, and the IRS serves a wage levy against the debtor for postpetition debts, the levy must state it reaches only those wages which exceed the payments to the trustee.
b. IRM 5.9.3.7, Collection Due Process (CDP) Cases, provides information on debtors’ rights, including pre-levy notice when levy action is being considered for postpetition tax debts.
Caution: The automatic stay may prohibit some actions to collect postpetition tax liabilities after confirmation of the Chapter 13 plan. However, the filing of notices of federal tax liens and setting off postpetition overpayments may not be violations of the automatic stay. Counsel should be consulted for legal advice, because judicial districts differ as to which assets (if any) are protected property of the estate after confirmation. IRM 5.9.4.1 and IRM 5.9.10.8.1 give additional information on property of the estate.
Given the above and the materials in the GL-2 training manual at pages 10-13 and 10- 14, it appears that the local rules are the controlling factor here when reviewing what levels of the levy process may be used when pursuing post-petition assets in a Chapter 13 case. Therefore, any advice regarding the procedures used in Florida should be issued by or coordinated with the Counsel office for that area.
2
The use of these levy procedures is only available if the post-petition liability is not covered by the plan. If an administrative claim was filed and the plan covers the liability, then alternative collection approaches available are listed in IRM 5.9.10.9(5). If the levy procedures are applicable, however, Insolvency must be careful not to pursue assets that are being used to fund the plan as this may violate the automatic stay. Attention to this should especially be paid if Insolvency is intending to levy the debtor's wages and the plan does not specify the amount of wages to be paid to the trustee.
Please let me know if you have additional questions on this matter. Thank you.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace