CCA 200948044: Parent and subsidiary should execute a new Form 870-LT
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
This Chief Counsel Advice addresses a TEFRA entity and a settlement agreement. Because the parent’s signature is necessary and the limitations period remains open, Counsel recommends that both the parent and subsidiary execute a new Form 870-LT. The advice cites IRM 8.19.3.8.6(5).
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Who should execute a new Form 870-LT when a parent’s signature is necessary and the limitations period remains open?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 6224 and 6229; Form 870-LT; IRM 8.19.3.8.6(5)
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2009100816264054 Number: 200948044
Release Date: 11/27/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6224.01-01
From: --------------------------
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 4:26:40 PM
To: -----------------------------------------
Cc: ----------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: TEFRA entity
As the parent's signature is necessary and the limitations period remains open, we recommend having
both parent and subsidiary execute a new Form 870-LT. See IRM 8.19.3.8.6(5).
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace