CCA 200947044: Partnership treatment of a contribution outside TEFRA
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
This Chief Counsel advice states that Roberts v. Commissioner governs a question concerning a partnership contribution. It says that, absent a TEFRA proceeding to redetermine the partnership's treatment, both the taxpayer and the government are bound by how the partnership treated the contribution.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Are the taxpayer and government bound by a partnership's treatment of a contribution when no TEFRA proceeding redetermined that treatment?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 6231; Roberts v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 853 (1990)
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2009100716264037 Number: 200947044
Release Date: 11/20/2009
Office: ----------
UILC: 6231.05-00
From: -------------------
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 4:26:45 PM
To: ---------------
Cc: -----------------------------
Subject: RE: Non-Partnership or Affected Item
The case is governed by Roberts v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 853 at 860 (1990). Both taxpayer and the
government are bound by how the partnership treated the contribution in the absence of a TEFRA
proceeding to redetermine the partnership's treatment.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace