CCA 200946050: Sole owner not personally liable for prior partnership-period employment taxes
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
This Chief Counsel advice concludes that the sole owner of an LLC cannot be held personally liable for employment taxes incurred while the LLC had multiple members and was treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. The LLC later became a disregarded entity, but the change in classification did not apply to the earlier taxable periods. The advice relies on the entity-classification rule in Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-2(c)(iii). It is general advice about the stated facts and does not address other issues.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can the sole owner be personally liable for employment taxes incurred while the LLC was a partnership?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 6331; Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-2(c)(iii)
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2009071712262240 Number: 200946050
Office: --------------
Release Date: 11/13/2009
UILC: 6331.00-00
From: ----------------------
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 12:26:23 PM
To: --------------------------
Cc: ---------------------
Subject: LLC Liability, -----------------
This is to advise you that I’ve reviewed your memo to the --------------------------------------------- concerning the personal tax liability of a owner of an LLC. I concur with your conclusion that the sole owner cannot be held personally liable for the employment taxes incurred by the LLC while it was a multi-member LLC treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes.
In particular, I agree that this question of liability is governed by Treas. Reg. 301.7701-2(c)(iii). Under that regulation, a single-member LLC is not disregarded for the purposes of federal tax liabilities incurred during taxable periods in which the entity was not disregarded. Although the LLC here is currently a disregarded entity, it was not at the time the employment tax liabilities were incurred.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
If you have any questions about my comments or edits please give me a call.
Thanks--
------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
ATTACHMENT: [redacted]
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace