PLR 200946025: An S corporation received relief after its trust shareholder missed an ESBT election

Number
200946025
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362
Ruling dated
July 28, 2009
Publicly released
November 13, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS ruled that an S corporation would be treated as continuing to be an S corporation after its election terminated because shares were transferred to a trust without a timely ESBT election. The corporation represented that the termination was inadvertent and agreed with its shareholders to make consistent tax adjustments. The relief required the trustees to file the ESBT election and the trust to file amended returns within 60 days. The ruling did not decide whether the corporation or trust otherwise qualified.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the S corporation's election be treated as continuing after an inadvertent termination?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(e) and 1362(f); Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1(m)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200946025
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/13/2009
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------, ID No. -------------
--------------------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
---------------------
------------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B02
PLR-118836-09
Date:
July 28, 2009

X = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
State = --------------------
D1 = --------------------
D2 = --------------------------
Trust = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

Dear ----- --------------:

This responds to a letter dated April 2, 2009 submitted on behalf of X by its authorized representative, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

X was formed under the laws of State and elected to be an S corporation effective D1. On D2, shares of X were transferred to Trust. X represents that Trust qualified to be an Electing Small Business Trust (ESBT) within the meaning of § 1361(e). However, no election was made under § 1361(e)(3) to treat Trust as an ESBT. Trust, consequently, was an ineligible shareholder and, as a result, X’s S corporation election terminated on D2. X represents that the termination was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders have agreed to make any adjustments that the Commissioner may require, consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation.

Section 1361(e) defines an ESBT. Section 1361(e)(1)(A) provides that, except as provided in § 1361(e)(1)(B), an ESBT means any trust if (i) such trust does not have as a beneficiary any person other than (I) an individual, (II) an estate, (III) an organization described in § 170(c)(2), (3), (4), or (5), or (IV) an organization described in § 170(c)(1) which holds a contingent interest in such trust and is not a potential current beneficiary,
PLR-118836-09
2

(ii) no interest in such trust was acquired by purchase, and (iii) no election under § 1361(e) applies to such trust. Section 1361(e)(3) provides that an election under § 1361(e) shall be made by the trustee. Any such election shall apply to the taxable year of the trust for which made and all subsequent taxable years of such trust unless revoked with the consent of the Secretary.

Section 1.1361-1(m)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the trustee of the ESBT must make the ESBT election by signing and filing, with the service center where the S corporation files its income tax return, a statement that meets the requirements of § 1.1361-(m)(2)(ii).

Section 1362(f) provides, in part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to acquire the shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the termination of X’s S corporation election on D2 was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). We further hold that, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from D2 and thereafter, provided X’s S corporation election was valid and provided that the election was not otherwise terminated under § 1361(d).

The shareholders of X must include their pro-rata share of the separately stated and nonseparately computed items of X as provided in § 1366, make any adjustments to basis as provided in § 1367, and take into account any distributions made by X as provided in § 1368.

This ruling is further contingent upon (1) the trustees of Trust filing an ESBT election effective D2 with the appropriate service center and (2) the Trust filing amended returns for taxable years beginning D2 and thereafter consistent with the treatment of the Trust as an ESBT. The ESBT election and the amended returns must be filed within 60 days following the date of this letter and a copy of this letter should be
PLR-118836-09
3

attached to any such elections or returns. If X or its shareholders fail to treat themselves as described above, this ruling is null and void.

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed on whether X was or is otherwise eligible to be treated as an S corporation or whether Trust is eligible to be an ESBT.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(j)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Pursuant to a power of attorney on file, a copy of this letter is being sent to X’s authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Melissa C. Liquerman
Chief, Branch 2
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures: 2
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace