TEFRA applies when a partnership return is filed, subject to the small-partnership exception
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Counsel advised that the partnership should be analyzed under both TEFRA and non-TEFRA rules, although the facts most closely supported TEFRA treatment. A filed partnership return makes TEFRA mandatory even if no partnership ultimately exists, unless the small-partnership exception applies. The exception does not apply here because a trust is a pass-through partner. Counsel also noted that a trust with a capital interest may be a partner even without a profits interest, depending on whether it contributed property and has a right to capital appreciation.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Does TEFRA apply, and can a trust qualify as a partner through a capital interest?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 6233; Supreme Court tests in Culbertson and Tower
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2009092409455137 Number: 200945067
Release Date: 11/6/2009
Office: ----------
UILC: 6233.02-00
From: -------------------
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:45:56 AM
To: -----------------------
Cc: -----------
Subject: RE: Is this a tefra partnership?
You should protect the statute both ways (TEFRA and Non-TEFRA), but this is most like subject to TEFRA. Section 6233(b) provides that TEFRA is mandatory if a partnership return is filed even if no partnership is ultimately found to exist. The only exception is if the small partnership exception applies. The existence of a pass-thru partner (the trust) makes this exception inapplicable. So TEFRA applies.
Furthermore, you don't need a profits interest to be a partner if you have a capital interest. If the trust actually contributed property and has a right to capital appreciation, it would meet the definition of a partner under the Supreme Court tests in Culbertson and Tower. Your facts do not indicate whether this is the case.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace