Recharacterizing wages violates the accountable-plan rules
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Counsel advised that the proposed treatment was an impermissible recharacterization of wages. Counsel also concluded that it violated the business-connection requirement of an accountable plan. The advice noted that the IRS had issued formal Chief Counsel Advice on a similar issue involving a tool plan and could provide a copy for further assistance.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Does the proposed expense allowance comply with the accountable-plan business-connection requirement?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 62; accountable-plan business-connection requirement
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2009091608552041 Number: 200945056
Release Date: 11/6/2009
Office: -----------------------------
UILC: 62.00-00
From: ---------------
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 8:55:30 AM
To: ----------------------------------------
Cc: --------------------------------------
Subject: RE: Expense Allowance
--------
This is impermissible wage recharacterization and violates the business connection requirement of an
accountable plan. Although in a somewhat different context, we have issued formal CCA on this issue
involving a tool plan. ---------can get you a copy of that and we can help with this specifically if you'd like.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace