Partnership provisions cannot shorten a partner's general assessment period

Number
200945055
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Other Requests
Code sections
§ 6229, § 6501
Ruling dated
September 15, 2009
Publicly released
November 6, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Counsel advised that the IRS could rely on a partner's section 6501 limitations period in all cases. Citing Curr-Spec Partners, L.P. v. Commissioner, the advice explained that section 6501(a) creates a three-year period for assessing tax against an individual partner, while section 6229(a) establishes only a minimum period that can extend, but cannot shorten, that general period. Counsel cautioned that a Form 872 that does not reference partnership items will not extend the partner's section 6501 period for those items.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How do sections 6229 and 6501 interact for a partner's assessment period?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6229(a) and 6501(a); Curr-Spec Partners, L.P. v. Commissioner, 2009 WL 2437764, *3 (5th Cir. 2009); Ginsburg v. Commissioner, 127 T.C. 75, 89 (2006)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2009091510524554 Number: 200945055
Release Date: 11/6/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6229.00-00

From: --------------------------
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 10:52:47 AM
To: --------------------
Cc: -----------------------------------------
Subject: RE: 9-25-09 Carryover adj

The Service can now rely on a partner's section 6501 statute in all cases. See Curr-Spec Partners, L.P. v. Comm'r, 2009 WL 2437764, *3 (5th Cir. 2009) ("The unambiguous language of IRC § 6229(a) and IRC
§ 6501(a) mandates our conclusion that IRC § 6501(a) creates a three-year limitations period within which the Commissioner must assess "any tax" on individual partners--a period which IRC § 6229(a) can never shorten, regardless of the length of time that might have elapsed between the filing of the partnership's informational return and the Commissioner's issuance of an FPAA. Rather, IRC § 6229(a) establishes only the minimum time period that, when necessary, extends, i.e., supercedes, the general three-year limitations period of IRC § 6501(a).").

Note, though, that a Form 872 that does not reference partnership items will not extend the partner's section 6501 period for partnership items. See Ginsburg v. Commissioner, 127 T.C. 75, 89 (2006).

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace