Agencies must retain substantive records but may claim FOIA exemptions

Number
200945039
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
Code sections
§ 37
Ruling dated
August 31, 2009
Publicly released
November 6, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Counsel advised that federal agencies have record-keeping obligations under the Federal Records Act of 1950. Agencies must retain records reflecting the evolution of a process, including drafts, emails, or meeting notes containing substantive ideas or thought processes, but may dispose of drafts limited to typo corrections or logistics. Counsel also advised that records required to be retained can still qualify for FOIA exemptions, particularly the deliberative-process privilege for material reflecting the agency's thought process leading to a final product.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What records must be retained, and can retained records still be protected from FOIA disclosure?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: Federal Records Act of 1950; Freedom of Information Act; deliberative-process privilege

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-831184-09 Number: 200945039
Release Date: 11/6/2009
Office: ----------
UILC: 37.00.00-00

From: -----------
Sent: Monday 8/31/2009 6:42 PM
To: -------------------------
Cc: ----------------------------
Subject: Re: FOIA question re discount rate project

No. We have certain record keeping requirements under the Federal Records Act of 1950. I'll provide you with further information shortly -- the rules are quite detailed. The bottom line, however, is that federal agencies are legally obligated to retain "records" that reflect the evolution of a process. That does not mean that we have to keep everything, but we do need to retain the important or substantive stuff. For instance, drafts, e-mails or meeting notes reflecting substantive ideas or thought process require retention. On the other hand, drafts reflecting typo corrections or mere logistics (such as setting up a meeting date) can be disposed of.

HOWEVER, we are still entitled to claim exemptions under FOIA for the records that we are required to retain. In particular, we can usually protect this material under the deliberative process privilege. That privilege protects material reflecting our thought process leading up to the final product.

More later.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace