CCA 200944039: A disregarded LLC's tax lien should name its sole owner

Number
200944039
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Validity and Priority of Lien Against Mortgagees, Pledgees, Purchasers, and Judgment Creditors (Valid v. Invalid)
Code sections
§ 6323
Ruling dated
November 6, 2008
Publicly released
October 30, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

This Chief Counsel Advice considers a Notice of Federal Tax Lien filed against a single-member limited liability company that had not elected association classification. The Advice treats the company as disregarded for federal tax purposes and states that the lien should have named only its sole owner. Because the owner was not liable for the employment taxes and had no other Service liabilities, the Advice recommends telling the third-party lender that the Service had no lien against the owner and that subordination was unnecessary. It also recommends filing a notice of withdrawal as to the redacted property or rights to property, under Treas. Reg. § 301.6323(j)-1.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Is a federal tax lien valid when a Notice of Federal Tax Lien names both a single-member disregarded LLC and its sole owner?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6323; Treas. Reg. §§ 301.7701-2(c)(2), 301.7701-3(a), 301.6323(j)-1; IRM 5.12.2.6.3(1)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2008110615251954 Number: 200944039
Release Date: 10/30/2009
Office: ----------------
UILC: 6323.00-00

From: --------------------
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 3:25:23 PM
To: ------------------------
Cc:
Subject: ------------------------------------------------------

-----------

----------------------------- -------a Corporation (“----------------”) failed to pay certain employment taxes in connection with the payment of wages to its employees during -----
------- and -------. ----------------did not make an election to be classified as an association. Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-3(a). Accordingly, ----------------is disregarded as an entity separate from its sole owner, ----------------------. Id. at § 301.7701-2(c)(2). During June 2007 the Service thereafter filed a Notice of Federal Tax Lien (NFTL) (Form 668) in with the Recorder of Deeds in the --------------------------, and this notice included the following:

Name of Taxpayer
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Residence
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------

We confirmed that the above address, while listed as an address of “residence”, is the business address of ---------------. According to the Service’s records, ------------------------ lives at a different address. A third-party lender considering extending credit to ----- -----
---------- discovered the NFTL and has asked the Service to subordinate the Service’s tax lien. The third-party has not alleged that the Service’s NFTL is incorrectly filed, and it apparently believes that the tax lien attached to ------------------property and rights to property. The Service’s Technical Services branch has questioned the NFTL’s validity, in light of the fact that it contains both the limited liability company’s name and the owner’s name on it.

On October 30, 2008 -------------, the Revenue Officer making this request, confirmed to us that ----------------is not liable for the employment taxes and has no existing liabilities to the Service. Rather, the lien encumbers -------------------------property and rights to property.

We recommend advising ----------------that the Service has no lien against ------------------- and that a subordination is therefore unnecessary. In this case Service should have 2

followed Internal Revenue Manual 5.12.2.6.3(1) when preparing the NFTL. This states, in part, " . . . [w]hen filing a NFTL on a single-member disregarded LLC, only the name of the single member should appear on the lien document. Do not include the name of the disregarded LLC . . ."

We also recommend that -----------------file a notice of withdrawal of the tax lien, pursuant to Treas. Reg. 301.6323(j)-1, as to "------------------------------------------".

Please call if you have any questions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace