CCA 200940019: A second statutory notice may depend on the first notice and the open limitation period
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
This Chief Counsel Advice addresses erroneous refunds and the possibility of issuing another statutory notice of deficiency in a TEFRA matter. It asks what event caused the refund and states that, for the affected item, a new notice may be issued only if the taxpayer did not petition the first notice and the statute of limitations remains open for issuing the second notice. The advice therefore focuses on the procedural limits for a further deficiency notice under IRC § 6212.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: When may the Service issue a new statutory notice for an affected item after an erroneous refund?
- Outcome: Advice given.
- Key authorities: IRC § 6212.
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2009070113571237 Number: 200940019
Release Date: 10/2/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6212.00-00, 6212.07-00
From: -------------------
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 1:57:15 PM
To: --------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: Erroneous Refunds in TEFRA
What was the event that caused us to issue the refund?
For the affected item, we can only issue a new stat notice if the taxpayer does not petition the first one
and the statute is still open for issuing the second notice.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace