PLR 200938030: Demutualization proceeds were not plan assets after plan termination

Number
200938030
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Taxability of Beneficiary of Employee's Trust (Time and Manner of Taxation)
Code sections
§ 402, § 401, § 501, § 6110
Ruling dated
June 26, 2009
Publicly released
September 18, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An association asked whether cash proceeds from an insurance company's demutualization were assets of a terminated defined contribution plan. The plan had used its remaining assets to buy a group annuity contract for participants who chose periodic payments, and the contract was not a qualified retirement plan. The IRS concluded that the plan was no longer in existence when the demutualization occurred, so the proceeds received by the successor company were not plan assets. The letter says that five other ruling requests about the transaction were sent to Chief Counsel for appropriate action.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Were the cash proceeds from the demutualization of the mutual insurance company plan assets?
  • Outcome: Denied for the resolved ruling request.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a), 501(a), and 6110(k)(3); Rev. Rul. 69-157.

Full text (IRS public release)

200938030

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service

UI No. 402.00-00

LEGEND:

Association B =
Company A =
Company B =
Company C =

Group Annuity
Contract A =

Plan X =

JUN 26 2009

SE:T:EP:RA:T3

Dear:

This is in response to a letter dated December 12, 2008 submitted by your authorized representatives in which you requested a ruling, on behalf of Association B, concerning section 402 of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code").

The following facts and representations have been submitted:

In or around 1956, Company A established Plan X, a defined contribution plan intended to qualify under section 401(a) of the Code, for its employees. Company A terminated Plan X approximately twenty years ago. At the time of termination, participants were given the option of receiving plan proceeds through periodic payments or through a lump-sum payment. In order to effectuate this plan termination, those who requested lump sum payments received lump sum distributions of their entire account balances. The remaining plan assets were used to purchase Group Annuity Contract A in order to make periodic payments to participants. Company A was the Group Annuity Contract A policyholder. All obligations and claims were paid under the plan were satisfied prior to the purchase of the Group Annuity Contract A

You have stated that Group Annuity Contract A was purchased from Company B using assets from the terminated plan and that no other premiums were made on Annuity A. You have stated that Group Annuity contract A is not a qualified retirement plan.

Page 2

Company A remained the policyholder of Group Annuity Contract A until merging with Company C, in 19

Company B converted from a mutual company to a stock company in 20 As part of this demutualization, Company B distributed stock to Company C, as the group annuity policyholder, in exchange for mutual fund membership interests in the year 20 Company C sold the stock in the same year. Company C then transferred the cash proceeds of the sale to Association B so that Association B could equitably distribute the proceeds to the individual annuitants. These proceeds are now being held in a separate, interest earning bank account awaiting distribution.

Based on the foregoing, you request a ruling that the demutualization proceeds are plan assets.

Section 401(a) of the Code provides that a trust created or organized in the United States and forming part of a qualified stock bonus, pension, or profit-sharing plan of an employer shall constitute a qualified trust only if the various requirements set out in section 401(a) of the Code are met.

Section 501(a) of the Code provides that an organization described in section 401(a) (that is, a trust which is part of a qualified pension, profit-sharing or stock bonus plan) is exempt from taxation.

Revenue Ruling 69-157, 1969-1 C.B. 115, provides that a trust that is part of a qualified plan will not retain its qualified status after the plan has been terminated. Revenue Ruling 69-157 also provides that a plan is not considered terminated in fact where the plan continues in effect until all the assets have been distributed to participants in accordance with the terms of the plan.

Plan X was terminated and its trust assets liquidated approximately twenty years ago. At that time, Plan X used its trust assets to purchase Group Annuity Contract A in order to provide for payments to participants who opted to receive their distribution in the form of periodic payments. Group Annuity Contract A is not a qualified retirement plan. As a result, Plan X was not in existence at the time of the demutualization of Company B.

Accordingly, with respect to your first ruling request and based on the facts presented, we conclude that cash proceeds received by Company C resulting from the demutualization of Company B are not plan assets.

The other five ruling requests regarding this transaction have been sent to Chief Counsel for their appropriate action.

This ruling is based on the assumptions that Plan X was qualified under section 401(a) of the Code at all relevant times.

Page 3

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

This letter (original) is being sent to your authorized representative in accordance with a power of attorney on file in this office.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T3. Sincerely Yours, Frances V. Sloan, Manager Employee Plans Technical Group 3 Enclosures: Notice of Intention to Disclose

Deleted Copy of Ruling

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace