CCA 200937030: A U.S. branch tax director may represent the taxpayer as a bona fide corporate officer
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advised that, on the facts provided, the tax director of a U.S. branch could represent the taxpayer as a bona fide officer of the corporate tax matters partner. The advice explains that Circular 230 governs practice before the IRS and that the relevant portions of Form 2848 reflect those rules. It relies on Circular 230 §§ 10.7(c)(1)(iii) and (iv), which address representation by a general partner and by a bona fide corporate officer. If the tax director did not want to sign Form 2848, the advice pointed to IRM 1.25.1.2.1 for requirements applicable to another power-of-attorney document.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May a U.S. branch tax director sign Form 2848 and represent the taxpayer as a bona fide officer of the corporate tax matters partner?
- Outcome: Advice given.
- Key authorities: Circular 230, 31 C.F.R. §§ 10.3 and 10.7; Form 2848; IRM 1.25.1.2.1.
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA-129914-08 Number: 200937030
Release Date: 9/11/2009
Office: ----------
UILC: 8021.00-00
From: -------------------
Sent: Tue 12/9/2008 9:14 AM
To: ------------------------------
Cc: ----------------------------
Subject: FW: 2848 vs. 8821
Hi ------- -
The answer provided by ------------ to the POA question is below. It looks like the tax director can sign a 2848.
Please let me know if I can provide you with any more information.
Thanks,
----------
Based on the facts provided, the tax director of the U.S. branch may represent the taxpayer as a "bona fide officer" of the corporate TMP.
Circular 230 provides the regulations governing practice before the IRS. Part II of Form 2848 "Declaration of Representative" attempts to encapsulate the provisions of Circular 230. For example, items a, b, c, g, and r in Part II of Form 2848 are listed within Section 10.3 of Circular 230 which generally governs who may practice before the Service. Items d, e, f, k, h, and l in Part II of Form 2848 are described by Section 10.7 of Circular 230 who via section 10.3 are eligible to practice to the extent provided in section 10.7. Section 10.7(c)(1)(iii) permits a general partner to represent a partnership. Section 10.7(c)(1)(iv) permits a bona fide officer of a corporation (including a parent, subsidiary, or other affiliated corporation), association or organized group to represent a corporation, association, or organized group. While form 2848 does not use the exact language of Circular 230 in discussing officers, we feel the language under Section 10.7(c)(1)(iv) governs.
Therefore the tax director may represent the TMP via 10.7(c)(1)(iv), and then via 10.7(c)(1)(iii) can represent the taxpayer .
If the tax director still is reluctant to sign a Form 2848, IRM 1.25.1.2.1 describes the information a non-IRS document must contain for the Service to accept such document as a power of attorney, although such information includes a signed and dated statement from the representative that contains the declaration at issue as provided on the Form 2848.
Please let me know if you have any further questions.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace