Section 267 loss disallowance and the matching rule
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
This Chief Counsel Advice addressed a question under section 267 about losses in transactions between related parties. The email stated that the statute appears to disallow or defer only losses from sales or exchanges. It added that the matching rule would apply if the two parties used different methods of accounting, while noting that section 267 experts were being consulted.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Which related-party losses are disallowed or deferred under section 267, and when does the matching rule apply?
- Outcome: Advice given.
- Key authorities: IRC § 267.
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA-581337-09 Number: 200936033
Release Date: 9/4/2009
Office: ----------------
UILC: 267.00-00
From: -----------
Sent: Friday 5/8/09 1:37 PM
To: -------------------------
Cc: ----------------------------
Subject: Quick Question
The statute seems clear in disallowing or deferring only losses from sales or exchanges. The
"matching rule" would apply if the two parties were on different methods of accounting.
But I am copying the section 267 experts in case I am missing something.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace