CCA 200933034: Excess credit may be treated as a deficiency after section 35 amendment
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel Advice addressed the effect of a 2007 amendment to section 6211(b)(4) that added section 35. The advice concluded that the amendment became effective on December 29, 2007, so a deficiency determined after that date should include section 35 in the section 6211(b)(4) calculation. As a result, a notice of deficiency issued after December 29, 2007 could treat an excess credit as a deficiency.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could an excess credit be treated as a deficiency in a notice issued after December 29, 2007?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 35 and 6211(b)(4)
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2009071320311747 Number: 200933034
Release Date: 8/14/2009
Office: ----------------------------
UILC: 6211.00-00
From: ---------------------
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 8:32:13 PM
To: ----------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: Another possibility
The amendment to section 6211(b)(4) that added section 35 became effective on December 29, 2007. It
is our opinion that this means any deficiency determined after that date is determined by including section
35 as part of 6211(b)(4). Therefore, any notice of deficiency issued after 12/29/07 can treat the excess
credit as a deficiency.
Let me know if you need anything further,
----------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace