CCA 200933029: Advice on deducting conveyed land and replacement-cost valuation

Number
200933029
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Trade or Business (Deductible v. Not Deductible)
Code sections
§ 162, § 6110
Ruling dated
July 10, 2009
Publicly released
August 14, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice addressed whether the fair market value of land conveyed to the State of Alaska and a city could be deducted under section 162. It stated that the rationale of an earlier private letter ruling involving a Village Corporation appeared applicable to a transfer by a Regional Corporation. The advice also stated that the taxpayer's replacement-cost approach for valuing received property was consistent with applicable law and appeared permissible for all types of property.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer deduct the value of conveyed land and use a replacement-cost method to value received property?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 162; PLR 200147012

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2009071018590958 Number: 200933029
Release Date: 8/14/2009
Office: ----------------
UILC: 162.00-00

From: -------------------------
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 6:59:11 PM
To: --------------------------------------
Cc: --------------------
Subject: Section 162 request for advice

This is to follow-up on our conversations regarding whether the FMV of lands conveyed to the State of Alaska and the City is deductible under § 162. We previously considered a similar issue in PLR 200147012 with regards to a Village Corporation. As we discussed, the rationale of PLR 200147012 would seem to be applicable to a transfer of land by a Regional Corporation.

You also asked whether the taxpayer’s “replacement cost” approach to valuing the property it received is permissible. As discussed, this approach is consistent with applicable law and appears to be permissible for all types of property.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace