CCA 200932057: Tax-return preparation documents generally are not privileged

Number
200932057
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Privilege; To Counsel
Code sections
§ 7602, § 6110
Ruling dated
October 2, 2008
Publicly released
August 7, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advice addressed attorney-client privilege and work-product protection for documents and information obtained to prepare a tax return. The advice states that tax-return preparation materials are not covered by those protections. It characterizes tax-return preparation as primarily an accounting service rather than a legal service.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Are documents and information obtained to prepare a tax return protected by attorney-client privilege or the work-product doctrine?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 7602; United States v. Frederick, 182 F.3d 496, 500-01 (7th Cir. 1996); United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1043 (5th Cir. 1981)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-102180-08 Number: 200932057
Release Date: 8/7/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 7602.06-01, 7602.09-01

From: ------------------------
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2008 6:08 p.m.
To: ---------------------
Cc:
Subject: FW: ATAT Assistance - Attorney-Client Privilege ---------

Please see below. I'm not aware of any authoritative internal document prepared in the context of ATAT that discusses this point, but the privilege question on tax return preparation activities appears to be well- settled. Please call me if you wish to discuss this further.

__________
From:
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 7:16 AM
To:
Subject: RE: ATAT Assistance - Attorney -Client Privilege

Yes, that is correct. I don't know if there is a seminal case but I did a few short minutes of research. Documents and information obtained for the purpose of preparing a tax return are not covered by attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine. United States v. Frederick, 182 F.3d 496, 500-01 (7th Cir. 1996); United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1043 (5th Cir. 1981) (preparation of tax returns is primarily an accounting service, not a legal one, and accounting services are ordinarily not privileged).

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace