PLR 200931011: Husband and Wife receive more time to allocate GST exemptions
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS granted Husband and Wife an additional 60 days to allocate their generation-skipping transfer tax exemptions to earlier transfers to an irrevocable trust. Their attorney had reported the transfers on gift tax returns but failed to allocate any GST exemption for some transfers and allocated too little for others. The IRS treated Husband and Wife as the transferors of one-half of the entire value of the split gifts and allowed the allocations using the gift tax values on the transfer dates. The allocations must be made on supplemental Forms 709, with a copy of the ruling attached.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May Husband and Wife receive more time to allocate their GST exemptions to earlier transfers to the trust?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 2513, 2601, 2611, 2631, 2632, and 2642(g); Notice 2001-50; Treas. Reg. §§ 26.2632-1 and 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200931011
Release Date: 7/31/2009
Index Number: 2601.00-00, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------, ID No. ------------- Telephone Number:
-----------------------------
---------------------
-------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------
CC:PSI:B04 – PLR-144226-08
--------------------------------
Date:
March 31, 2009
----------------------------------
Legend:
Husband = --------------------------------------------------
Wife = ---------------------------------------------------
Date 1 = -------------------------
Attorney 1 = -------------------------------------
Attorney 2 = ---------------------------
Law Firm 1 = ---------------------------------------------------
Law Firm 2 = ---------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Dear -------------------------------:
This letter responds to a letter from your authorized representative dated October 6, 2008, and other correspondence, requesting an extension of time pursuant to § 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to allocate the generation-skipping transfer (GST) exemptions of Husband and Wife (Taxpayers) to transfers to Trust.
The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows: On Date 1, Husband executed the Husband Insurance Trust (Trust), an irrevocable trust created for the benefit of Husband and Wife’s two sons and their issue. The trust agreement was drafted by Attorney 1, a partner with Law Firm 1. In Year 1, Attorney 1 assisted Husband in transferring to Trust three life insurance policies on Husband’s life.
Taxpayers relied on Attorney 1 to prepare their Year 1 Forms 709, United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return, to report the transfers of the three life insurance policies to Trust in Year 1 and to split the gifts. On the Forms 709, Attorney 1 reported the date of transfer value of each life insurance policy and reported
PLR-144226-08
2
their aggregate value for gift tax purposes, but failed to allocate any part of either Taxpayer’s GST exemption to the value of the life insurance transferred to Trust.
In Year 2, Husband transferred cash to Trust, and Husband and Wife transferred a parcel of real estate (Property) to Trust.
Taxpayers relied on Attorney 1 to prepare their Year 2 Forms 709, to report the transfers of the cash and Property to Trust and to split the gifts. On the Forms 709, Attorney 1 reported the cash transfer and the appraised value of Property. Attorney 1 mistakenly allocated a portion of each Taxpayer’s GST exemption that was significantly smaller than the reported value of each Taxpayer’s Year 2 transfers to Trust.
In Year 3, Taxpayers hired Attorney 2 of Law Firm 2 to assist them with estate planning. Attorney 2 reviewed Taxpayers’ prior gift tax returns and concluded, in consultation with Attorney 1, that Taxpayers had not allocated sufficient amounts of their GST exemptions on their Year 1 and Year 2 gift tax returns.
Taxpayers have requested an extension of time under § 2642(g) and §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 to allocate Taxpayers’ GST exemptions to the Year 1 and Year 2 transfers to Trust.
Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer. A GST is defined under § 2611(a) as (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.
Section 2631(a) provides that, for purposes of determining the GST tax, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption of $1,000,000 (adjusted for inflation under § 2631(c)) which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is the transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable.
Section 2632(a) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her GST exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual’s estate (determined with regard to extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.
Section 26.2632-1(b)(2) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations provides that an allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the transferor’s lifetime, other than in a direct skip, is made on Form 709.
Section 2642(b)(1) provides, in relevant part, that if the allocation of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a timely filed gift tax return or is deemed to be made under § 2632(b)(1) or (c)(1), the value of such property for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio shall be its value as finally determined for gift
PLR-144226-08
3
tax purposes and such allocation shall be effective on and after the date of such transfer.
Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of § 2642(g)(1)(A), which was enacted into law on June 7, 2001.
Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to grant relief, the time for making the allocation shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.
Notice 2001-50, 2001-34 I.R.B. 189, provides that under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers is to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. The Notice further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation (and not expressly provided by statute). Under § 301.9100-1(b), a regulatory election includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.
Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.
Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
PLR-144226-08
4
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.
Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Pursuant to § 2513, Husband and Wife consented to split the Year 1 and Year 2 gifts. Thus, Husband and Wife are treated as the transferors for GST purposes of one-half of the entire value of transfers made by the donor spouse, regardless of the interest the electing spouse is actually deemed to have transferred under § 2513. Taxpayers are granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this letter to allocate their available GST exemptions to the Year 1 and Year 2 transfers to Trust, based on the gift tax values of those transfers on the dates of each transfer.
The allocations should be made on supplemental Forms 709, United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return for the years in which the transfers were made, and filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45999. A copy of this letter should be attached to each supplemental Form 709. A copy is enclosed for this purpose.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
Except as specifically ruled herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. Specifically, this ruling only applies to the Year 1 and Year 2 transfers to Trust and does not apply to any transfer to Trust made after Year 2. Further, we are not ruling on whether Trust will have a zero inclusion ratio as a result of Taxpayers’ allocations of their GST exemptions to the Year 1 and Year 2 transfers to the trust.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-144226-08
5
In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Curtis G. Wilson
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures
Copy for section 6110 purposes
Copy of this letter
cc:
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace