CCA 200930037: U.S. parent generally liable for employment taxes on earlier wages of foreign disregarded entity

Number
200930037
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Kintner-Type
Code sections
§ 911
Ruling dated
June 16, 2009
Publicly released
July 24, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

This Chief Counsel Advice addresses employment taxes on wages paid to employees of a foreign entity treated as disregarded from its U.S. parent for earlier years. It states that the IRS could assert that the U.S. parent was liable for FICA and FUTA on those wages because the employees were treated as working for an American employer. The advice says the wages would generally not be subject to income tax withholding if they were reasonably expected to qualify for the section 911 exclusion or were subject to withholding under foreign law. It also states that new regulations made the foreign entity no longer disregarded for employment-tax purposes for 2009 and later years, so the parent would no longer be liable for those wages.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Who is responsible for employment taxes on wages paid by a foreign disregarded entity for the years before new regulations applied?
  • Outcome: Advice given.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 911; FICA and FUTA employment-tax rules

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2009061616105732 Number: 200930037
Release Date: 7/24/2009
Office: -------------
UILC: 7701.01-01

From: --------------------
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 4:11:01 PM
To: --------------------
Cc: ------------------
Subject: RE: Check the Box

----------

For the years --------and -------, I can't see any reason why the IRS would not assert that the US parent is liable for employment taxes attributable to wages paid to employees of the foreign disregarded entity. The entity is disregarded as separate from its owner for all federal tax purposes for those years. Thus, it is as if the employees are working for an American employer. Generally, wages paid to US citizens working outside the United States for American employers are subject to FICA and FUTA. The wages won't be subject to income tax withholding if it is reasonable to believe at time of payment that they will be excludable from the recipient's gross income under section 911, or if they are subject to income tax withholding under the laws of a foreign country. I contacted -------------at one point to confirm that they support this view that the US parent is liable for employment taxes on wages paid by a foreign disregarded entity, and they agreed. Of course, for 2009 and forward, the foreign entity is no longer disregarded for employment tax purposes under the new regs, so the US parent would no longer be liable for employment taxes on wages paid to employees of the foreign entity. Hope this is helpful.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace