CCA 200928035: Annual periodic payments create an excess-benefit transaction at year-end

Number
200928035
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Excess Benefit Transaction
Topics
Code sections
§ 4958
Ruling dated
October 28, 2008
Publicly released
July 10, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel addressed when an excess-benefit transaction occurs for limitations-period purposes. When one contractual arrangement provides periodic payments throughout a disqualified person's tax year, the transaction involving the aggregate annual payments occurs on the last day of that year. Counsel thought this rule could apply even if the parties were unsure whether an actual written contract existed. Counsel also noted that services performed in earlier years may be considered when judging whether compensation paid in a later year was reasonable.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: When does an excess-benefit transaction occur for periodic payments, and may prior services support current compensation?
  • Outcome: Advice given that the aggregate transaction occurs at year-end and prior services may be considered
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 53.4958-1(e), 53.4958-4(a)(1)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-102895-08 Number: 200928035

Release Date: 7/10/2009

Office: -------------

UILC: 4958.00-00

From: --------------------

Sent: Tue 10/28/2008

To: ----------------------------

Cc:

Subject: RE: Requested Legal Opinion/Statute of Limitations

See reg 53.4958-1(e) Date of occurrence - where a single contractual arrangement provides for periodic payments over course of the DP's tax year, consider the excess benefit transaction with respect to the aggregate annual payments to occur on the last day of the tax year. I think this would apply even if they are not sure about an actual written contract, etc.

Re: the substance of the T/P's argument in this case, see reg 53.4958-4(a)(1) - in determining the reasonableness of comp paid in one year, services performed in prior years may be taken into account.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace