CCA 200928033: Partners may claim a refund for income duplicated after a TEFRA settlement
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advised that taxpayers had two years after signing Form 870-LT to claim a refund. Their settlement fixed the amount of partnership income, but the later computational adjustment allegedly failed to remove the same income that had also been reported on Schedule C. Removing genuinely duplicated Schedule C income would not conflict with the settlement. The taxpayers' earlier failure to raise the duplication did not invalidate Form 870-LT because that omission was not fraud, malfeasance, or a misrepresentation of fact under section 6224(c).
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May taxpayers seek a refund when a computational adjustment double-counted partnership income also reported on Schedule C?
- Outcome: Advice given that a timely refund claim may remove genuinely duplicated income
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 6224(c), 6230(c)(2)(B)(i)
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2009052711232637 Number: 200928033
Release Date: 7/10/2009
Office: -------------
UILC: 6224.01-01
From: --------------------
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 11:23:27 AM
To: -------------------
Cc: ------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: TEFRA audit reconsideration
Taxpayers have 2 years from the date the Form 870-LT was signed to file a refund claim. I.R.C. 6230(c)(2)(B)(i). The refund claim would be based on the fact that the Form 870-LT determined the amount of partnership income with finality and that the computational adjustment/assessment failed to back out the double reporting of that same income reported as Schedule C income. Backing out the Schedule C income would not be inconsistent with the Form 870-LT if the Schedule C truly duplicated the determined partnership income. The fact that taxpayers failed to raise this issue does not invalidate the Form 870-LT since the failure does not constitute fraud, malfeasance or misrepresentation of fact within the meaning of section 6224(c).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace