CCA 200928031: Computational correction may be assessed directly, but its penalty requires a deficiency notice

Number
200928031
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Effect of Failure to Notify
Code sections
§ 6222
Ruling dated
May 27, 2009
Publicly released
July 10, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised that the IRS could directly assess an inconsistently reported partnership amount when the correction was purely computational. The example was substituting the amount shown on Schedule K-1 for the amount the taxpayer reported. A related penalty could not be directly assessed through the same route and would require a notice of deficiency.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the IRS directly assess an inconsistent partnership amount and the related penalty?
  • Outcome: Advice given that the computational adjustment may be directly assessed, but the penalty requires a deficiency notice
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6222

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2009052710510537 Number: 200928031

Release Date: 7/10/2009

Office: -------------

UILC: 6222.03-00

From: --------------------

Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 10:51:07 AM

To: -------------------

Cc: --------------------------------------

Subject: RE: IRC 6222

I agree that we can make a direct assessment if the assessment of the inconsistently reported amount is purely computational, i.e., substituting the K-1 amount for the reported amount. We would need to issue a notice of deficiency, however, for the related penalty.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace