CCA 200927035: Ascertainable value generally fixes the amount realized at the sale date

Number
200927035
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Determination of Amount of and Recognition of Gain or Loss
Code sections
§ 1001
Ruling dated
May 11, 2009
Publicly released
July 2, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel offered a preliminary response to a fair-market-value question and expressly stated that no research had been done on the specific issue. The email points to authorities limiting the open-transaction doctrine to unusual circumstances and mentions the Ninth Circuit’s Warren Jones case. It states the general rule that the amount realized is determined on the sale date when the asset received has an ascertainable fair market value. The release does not include the underlying question or transaction facts.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: When is the amount realized determined if the property received has an ascertainable fair market value?
  • Outcome: Advice given: generally at the date of sale
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1001 (indexed issue); Warren Jones (Ninth Circuit case named without a reporter citation)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2009051115524542 Number: 200927035
Office: ----------------------------
Release Date: 7/2/2009

UILC: 1001.00-00

From: ----------------------
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 3:52:53 PM
To: --------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: FMV issue

It's not often that I get thanked for doing nothing. It is much more common to work and not receive thanks.

I have not done any research in response to your specific question. I would however refer you to the authorities suggesting the "open transaction" doctrine is no longer considered valid except in unusual circumstances. A Ninth Circuit case by the name of Warren Jones comes to mind. The general rule is that you determine the amount realized on the date of sale so long as the asset you receive has an "ascertainable fair market value."

Thanks.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace