PLR 200925029: Option adjustments following a special distribution arose from a corporate transaction

Number
200925029
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Definitions and Special Rules
Code sections
§ 409A, § 422, § 424
Ruling dated
March 16, 2009
Publicly released
June 19, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A real estate investment trust made a special distribution after liquidating a subsidiary. The distribution was nonrecurring, related to a capital transaction, and potentially diluted the value of outstanding employee stock options. The company proportionally adjusted all outstanding options, including options intended to qualify as incentive stock options. The IRS ruled that the distribution was a corporate transaction under the section 424 regulations and that the option adjustments occurred by reason of that transaction. It did not rule on whether the options otherwise satisfied section 422 or on the application of section 409A.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did proportional adjustments to incentive stock options following the special distribution occur by reason of a corporate transaction?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 424(a); Treas. Reg. § 1.424-1(a)(3), (4)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200925029
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/19/2009
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 424.00-00
-------------------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
---------------
Refer Reply To:
----------------------
CC:TEGE:EB:EC
----------------------------
PLR-143748-08
----------------------------
Date:
March 16, 2009
In Re: ----------------------

LEGEND
Taxpayer = ----------------------
Subsidiary A = ----------------------------------------
State A = -------------
Stock Plan = ---------------------------------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Month 1 = ---------------
Date 1 = -----------------------
Date 2 = -----------------------
Date 3 = --------------------------
$a = --------

Dear ------------:

This letter is in response to the letter, dated October 8, 2008 and submitted by your authorized representative, requesting certain rulings under section 424 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) regarding the adjustment, as the result of a particular transaction, of outstanding options intended to qualify as incentive stock options under section 422 of the Code. The facts, as presented, are as follows.

Taxpayer is a real estate investment trust (REIT) incorporated in State A.
Taxpayer has common equity securities that are required to be registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In Year 1, Taxpayer adopted the Stock Plan, which was approved by Taxpayer’s stockholders. Under the terms of the Stock Plan, eligible individuals may receive incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock. Options intended to qualify as incentive stock options under section 422 of the Code have been granted under the Stock Plan to officers and directors of Taxpayer.

PLR-143748-08
2

The Stock Plan includes an adjustment provision under which Taxpayer’s compensation committee “may make such substitution or adjustment, if any, as it deems to be equitable” with respect to the number or kind of shares or other securities issued or reserved for issuance pursuant to the Stock Plan, as applicable, and to outstanding awards in the event of any change in Taxpayer’s outstanding shares by reason of any share dividend or split, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, spinoff, combination or exchange of shares or other corporate change, or any distributions to common stockholders other than regular cash dividends.

The agreement evidencing options granted under the Stock Plan that are intended to qualify as incentive stock options includes an adjustment provision under which Taxpayer’s compensation committee “shall make such substitution or adjustment, if any, as it deems to be equitable” with respect to the number or kind of shares or other securities issued or reserved for issuance pursuant to the Stock Plan, as applicable, and to outstanding awards in the event of any change in Taxpayer’s outstanding shares by reason of any share dividend or split, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, spinoff, combination or exchange of shares or other corporate change, or any distributions to common stockholders other than regular cash dividends.

Since Taxpayer became a REIT in Year 2, Taxpayer has not paid regular dividends and has not paid any other dividend or made any other distribution to its stockholders. In Month 1 of Year 3, Taxpayer liquidated Subsidiary A. As a result of such liquidation, on Date 1, Taxpayer declared a special distribution of $a per share payable to its stockholders of record on Date 2.

The special distribution represents a nonrecurring event and not a part of a pattern of dividends or distributions. The special distribution is directly related to a capital transaction (i.e., the liquidation of Subsidiary A) representing a nonrecurring event that is separate and apart from Taxpayer’s core business activities. The special distribution is not a payout of normal corporate earnings. Further, the special distribution potentially reduced or diluted the value of the option holders’ interests relative to those of the stockholders who received the special distribution.

As a result of the special distribution, on Date 3 Taxpayer made a proportional adjustment of outstanding options, including options intended to qualify as incentive stock options under section 422 of the Code, under the Stock Plan. The adjustment applied to all options that were outstanding when the special distribution was paid. The options cover the same stock before and after the adjustments.

Section 424(a) of the Code provides that the term “issuing or assuming a stock option in a transaction to which section 424(a) applies” means a substitution of a new option for the old option, or an assumption of the old option, by an employer corporation, or a parent or subsidiary of such corporation, by reason of a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, separation, reorganization or liquidation, if (1) the excess of the aggregate fair market value of the shares subject to

PLR-143748-08
3

the option immediately after the substitution or assumption over the aggregate option price of such shares is not more than the excess of the aggregate fair market value of all shares subject to the option immediately before such substitution or assumption over the aggregate option price of such shares, and (2) the new option or the assumption of the old option does not give the employee additional benefits which he did not have under the old option.

Section 1.424-1(a)(4)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations (Regulations) provides that in order for a change in an option or issuance of a new option to qualify as a substitution or assumption, the change must occur by reason of a “corporate transaction” as defined in section 1.424-1(a)(3).

Section 1.424-1(a)(4)(ii) of the Regulations provides that generally a change in an option or issuance of a new option is considered to be by reason of a corporate transaction unless the relevant facts and circumstances demonstrate that such change or issuance is made for reasons unrelated to such corporate transaction. A change in an option or issuance of a new option will be considered to be made for reasons unrelated to a corporate transaction if there is an unreasonable delay between the corporate transaction and such change in the option or issuance of a new option or if the corporate transaction serves no substantial corporate business purpose independent of the change in options.

Section 1.424-1(a)(4)(iii) of the Regulations provides that a change in an option or issuance of a new option is by reason of a distribution or change in the terms or number of the outstanding shares of a corporation only if the option as changed, or the new option issued, is an option on the same stock as under the old option.

Section 1.424-1(a)(3)(ii) of the Regulations provides that the term corporate transaction includes a distribution (excluding an ordinary dividend or a stock split or stock dividend described in section 1.424-1(e)(4)(v)) or change in the terms or number of outstanding shares of a corporation.

Based solely on the facts presented, we rule as follows:

  1. The special distribution made on Date 1 was a “corporate transaction” within the
    meaning of that term as used in section 1.424-1(a)(3) of the Regulations.

  2. The Date 3 adjustment of options intended to qualify as incentive stock options that
    were granted pursuant to the Stock Plan to reflect the special distribution is treated as occurring “by reason of” a “corporate transaction” (within the meaning of those terms as used in section 1.424-1(a)(3) and (4) of the Regulations).

    No opinion is expressed or implied regarding whether options granted under the
    Stock Plan satisfy the requirements of section 422 of the Code. No opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of the proposed transactions

PLR-143748-08
4

under any other provision of the Code or regulations or the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the proposed transactions that are not specifically covered by the above rulings. In particular, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the application of section 409A of the Code to the proposed transactions.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

THOMAS D. SCHOLZ
Assistant Branch Chief
Executive Compensation Branch
Office of Division Counsel/Associate
Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and
Government Entities)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace