CCA 200924050: Defense contractor tax details required consent before IRS disclosure

Number
200924050
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Disclosure to Taxpayer's Designee
Code sections
§ 6103
Ruling dated
April 23, 2009
Publicly released
June 12, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel addressed whether the IRS could give procurement officials tax information about defense contractors subject to a Federal Acquisition Regulation self-certification requirement. The self-certification rules did not independently authorize IRS disclosure. If a procurement official wanted more information about a contractor's reported tax matter, or suspected that the contractor's information was incomplete, the official could ask the contractor for consent. A Form 8821 or another signed and dated document satisfying section 6103 and the applicable regulation would be sufficient consent.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How could procurement officials obtain IRS tax information beyond a defense contractor's FAR self-certification?
  • Outcome: Advice given, disclosure required the contractor's consent
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6103; Treas. Reg. § 301.6103(c)-1(b)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-432726-09 Number: 200924050
Release Date: 6/12/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6103.03-00

From: ---------------------
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 7:26 AM
To: ------------------
Cc: ----------------------------
Subject: Tax Information on Defense Contractors ---------

-------------

You are correct that there is no provision for disclosure specifically included in the new FAR self tax certification requirements. In part in an effort to not bog down the contracting officers and procurement folks with having to become tax experts in the course of their responsibility determination, the self certification of the contractor stands alone and speaks for itself like other certification made by the contractors in the course of bidding for a contract. If there is something in the information received by the contracting official in the course of the procurement process that they feel they need additional information about from the IRS they can ask the contractor to provide a consent to disclosure of the information they need and send that to the IRS. Neither the FAR regs on self tax certification nor the Code consent provision detail the circumstances under which a consent should or could be sought. For example, if the procurement officer wants additional information about a tax matter reported by a contractor, or if a procurement official has reason to believe the information provided by the contractor is incomplete, a consent can be sought. It is my understanding that the contractor faces the same ramifications for providing incorrect or inadequate information in response to the self tax certification as it does for the other information required to be provided under the FAR.

I am not sure if the FAR or any of the information about the new certification when it was added provided information about consents. A Form 8821, Tax Information Authorization, or any other document signed and dated by the contractor/taxpayer that meets the requirements of IRC 6103 and Treas. Reg. 301.6103(c)-1(b) will suffice.

Let me know if you have any more questions.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace