CCA 200924043: Subsidiary took deferred distribution loss into account on parent's LLC conversion
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A subsidiary distributed all interests in a disregarded entity to its parent and recognized a loss that was deferred under section 267(f) and the consolidated-return rules. The parent later contributed the subsidiary's stock to the disregarded entity and converted into an LLC treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. Chief Counsel advised that, at least when the subsidiary was a first-tier subsidiary, section 267(f)(2) caused the subsidiary to take the deferred loss into account when the parent liquidated under section 331 as a result of the LLC conversion. The advice confirmed an earlier discussion and then set out the transaction's facts.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: When did the subsidiary take into account its deferred loss from the section 301 distribution?
- Outcome: Advice given, the loss was taken into account when the parent's LLC conversion caused a section 331 liquidation
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 267(f)(2), 301, and 331; Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-13
Full text (IRS public release)
Office of Chief Counsel
Internal Revenue Service
Memorandum
Number: 200924043
Release Date: 6/12/2009
CC:CORP:01:LMThompson
Third Party Communication: None
POSTU-147140-08
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
UILC: 267.07-01, 267.07-02, 301.00-00, 331.00-00
date: March 09, 2009
to: -------------------
Internal Revenue Agent
(-----------------------------------------)
from: Stephen P. Fattman
Special Counsel
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
Leah M. Thompson
General Attorney, Branch 1
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
subject: --------------------------------------------
This Chief Counsel Advice responds to your request for assistance. This advice may not be used or cited as precedent.
LEGEND
Parent = -------
Year 1 = -------
Sub = ------------------------
Disregarded Entity = -------------------
A = ----
Shareholder 1 = -------------
POSTU-147140-08
2
B = ------
C = ----
D = ------
E = ----
F = ----
G = --------
H = --
General Partner = -------------------------
I = ----
J = ------
Individual 1 = ---------------------
Individual 2 = -------------------
K = --
L = --------
Dear ---------:
You asked us whether the loss recognized in the section 301 distribution by Sub, deferred under section 267(f) and not taken into account under section 1502-13, can be taken into account when Parent converts to an LLC. We are writing to confirm that, at least where Sub is a first tier subsidiary of Parent, under 267(f)(2), Sub takes the loss into account when Parent liquidated under section 331 as a result of the LLC conversion. Just to confirm the essence of our discussion the facts are laid out below.
FACTS
Parent was the common parent of a consolidated (and controlled) group. In Year 1, Parent’s wholly-owned Sub, distributed 100% of the membership interests in Disregarded Entity to Parent (the 301 Distribution). Sub recognized a loss in the 301 Distribution that was deferred under section 267(f) and section 1502-13. Parent then
POSTU-147140-08
3
contributed 100% of the stock in Sub to Disregarded Entity. Then Parent converted into an LLC, treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes, under a state law formless conversion statute.
At the time of the conversion of Parent, A% of Parent stock was owned by Shareholder 1 (a partnership for federal tax purposes), B% was owned by Investment Fund (a corporation for federal tax purposes), and C% was owned by Individuals. D% of Shareholder 1 was owned by Investment Fund, E% of Shareholder 1 was owned by Institutional Investors, and F% of Shareholder 1 was owned by Individual Family Partnerships.
Shortly after the conversion of Parent, Parent transferred Disregarded Entity to a new master limited partnership (MLP), a partnership for federal tax purposes, in exchange for G% of the MLP interests. In the same transaction, the MLP issued H% of its total equity to General Partner (a partnership for federal tax purposes). General Partner is owned I% by Shareholder 1, and J% by each of Individual A and Individual B (who each owned K% of Parent). The MLP issued L% of its equity to the public as part of the same overall transaction. An additional H% of MLP’s equity was issued to the public a year later in an unrelated transaction.
This writing may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized disclosure of this writing may undermine our ability to protect the privileged information. If disclosure is determined to be necessary, please contact this office for our views.
If you have any further questions please contact Leah M. Thompson at (202) 622-7750 or Stephen P. Fattman at (202) 622-7700
_____
______
Stephen P. Fattman
Leah M. Thompson
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace