CCA 200923047: Explanation of items need not mention self-dealing
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel gave brief advice about the explanation of items for a statutory notice. The advice says there was no reason for that explanation to mention self-dealing. The released email does not provide the underlying facts or further analysis.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Should the explanation of items mention self-dealing?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 4945
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2009050708053853 Number: 200923047
Release Date: 6/5/2009
Office: -----------------------------
UILC: 4945.00-00
From: -------------------------
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 8:05:41 AM
To: ------------------------------------------------
Cc: -------------------
Subject: RE: L case Stat notice
For the explanation of items, there is no reason to mention self-dealing. ---------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace