CCA 200923032: Loss importation transaction did not trigger listed-transaction exception
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel considered whether a loss importation transaction fell within the listed-transaction exception to section 6404(g). A transaction's listed status is determined on the date the IRS provides the section 6404 notice. Here, the transaction became listed only after an April 2007 letter, so only adjustments in a later 30-day letter could potentially qualify. But section 6707A defines a listed transaction through the disclosure rules, and neither the taxpayers nor their S corporation had been required to disclose this transaction under the applicable regulations. The advice therefore concludes that the transaction was not a listed transaction for these taxpayers and the section 6404(g)(2)(E) exception did not apply.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did the taxpayers' loss importation transaction qualify as a listed transaction for the section 6404(g) exception?
- Outcome: Advice given, the exception did not apply
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 6011, 6404(g)(2)(E), and 6707A(c); Temp. Treas. Reg. § 301.6404-4T(b)(5)(i); Notice 2007-57
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA-210230-09 Number: 200923032
Release Date: 6/5/2009
Office: ----------------------------
UILC: 9300.43-00, 6404.00-00
From: --------------------
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 2:30 PM
To: --------------------
Cc: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: Protest Comments
First, pursuant to 301.6404-4T(b)(5)(i), whether a transaction is a listed transaction for purposes of section 6404(g) is determined on the date the Service provides the 6404 notice to the taxpayer. In this case, the transaction was listed after the 4/20/07 letter. So the only possible adjustments it could have applied to were the ones in the 30-day letter issued 5/2008. However, in this case the transaction was not a listed transaction for these taxpayers. For purposes of section 6404(g)(2)(E), listed transaction is defined in section 6707A(c). Section 6707A(c)(2) provides: The term "listed transaction" means a reportable transaction that is the same as, or substantially similar to, a transaction specifically identified by the Secretary as a tax avoidance transaction for purposes of section 6011. Under section 6707A(c)(1), a reportable transaction is "any transaction with respect to which information is required to be included with a return or statement because, as determined under regulations prescribed under section 6011, such transaction is of a type which the Secretary determines as having a potential for tax avoidance or evasion." The tax years involved are ------- and -------. The taxpayers entered into the transaction in -------. Although the transaction was listed in ------- pursuant to Notice 2007-57, neither the taxpayers nor the S Corp were required to disclose the transaction under the applicable disclosure regulations. Therefore, the transaction does not qualify as a listed transaction under section 6707A(c) and the exception under section 6404(g)(2)(E) does not apply.
Does that help?
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace