CCA 200922029: Plan review rejected two excise-tax approaches but flagged benefit-limit concerns

Number
200922029
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Tax on Reversion of Qualified Plan Assets to Employer
Topics
Code sections
§ 4975, § 4980, § 415
Ruling dated
April 21, 2009
Publicly released
May 29, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

After internal discussions and consultation with the Department of Labor, Chief Counsel reported a decision not to treat the reviewed transactions as prohibited transactions under section 4975 or pursue section 4980 excise tax against the plan sponsors' owner-sellers. The email noted that section 4980(b) places the excise tax on the employer maintaining the plan and that controlled-group rules did not apply to that section. Separately, it identified distributions that appeared to exceed the section 415(b) benefit limits. If that apparent violation were confirmed, the plan would be disqualified. The office also noted that the examination explanation did not address how or whether an identified amount was reported as taxable income.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Which tax issues should be pursued in the reviewed plan transactions?
  • Outcome: Advice given: do not pursue the stated section 4975 and owner-seller section 4980 theories; examine the apparent section 415(b) violation and income reporting.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 4975, 4980(b), 415(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2009042108352450 Number: 200922029
Release Date: 5/29/2009
Office: -------------------------
UILC: 4980.00-00 and 4975.00-00

From: --------------------
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 8:35:30 AM
To: -------------------
Cc: -----------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: -------------- Cases

After meeting with --------------, ------------ from ------------, and ------------, it was decided that we should not treat these transactions as prohibited transactions under section 4975 of the Code (This is also after consultation with Department of Labor.) or pursue section 4980 excise tax against the owner/sellers of the plan sponsors. The controlled group rules don’t apply to section 4980, ----------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- Also, section 4980(b) says that the section 4980 excise tax shall be paid by the employer maintaining the plan. -------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the ------------ case, in the Form 886A on page 2 it says that the Form 5500 Schedule I for Plan Year ended December 31, ------- show benefits paid of $----------------, which total distributions made to ---- ------------- in Exhibits 5 and 6. This distribution amount appears to be a violation of the section 415(b) limitations. If that is the case the section 415(b) limitation violation would disqualify the Plan. Also, there is no reference in the Form 886A how or whether the $--------------- was reported as taxable income to Taxpayer.

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.

------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace