Determination 200921033: Hospital withdrew funding request and received conditional tax waivers

Number
200921033
Outcome
Mixed outcome
Document type
Determination Letter
IRS subject
Additional Tax
Topics
Code sections
§ 4971
Ruling dated
February 23, 2009
Publicly released
May 22, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's determination, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A hospital withdrew its request to waive a pension plan's minimum funding standard for one plan year. The IRS separately granted conditional waivers of the 100 percent tax under section 4971(b) for several plan years, but only if the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation terminated the plan. The hospital had stopped benefit accruals, entered Chapter 11 reorganization, and arranged to sell substantially all operating assets before liquidating. The planned asset sale required the PBGC to assume the plan through a distress or involuntary termination. If termination was not approved, the hospital could ask the IRS to reopen its withdrawn minimum-funding waiver request.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What relief remained available after the hospital withdrew its minimum-funding waiver request while pursuing PBGC termination?
  • Outcome: Mixed: the funding waiver request was withdrawn, and section 4971(b) tax waivers were granted conditionally.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 4971(b); ERISA §§ 3002(b), 4041, 4042.

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 4971.02-00
200921033

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

Date: FEB 23 2009

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

SE:T:EP:RA:A2

Re:

Hospital =
Buyer =

Dear

This letter constitutes notice that pursuant to your authorized representative's request of January 8, 2009:

(1) your request for a waiver of the minimum funding standard for the Plan for the plan year ending November 30, [illegible], has been withdrawn, and the case has been closed by this office; and

(2) waivers of the 100 percent tax under section 4971(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) have been granted for the Plan for the plan years ending November 30, [illegible], through [illegible], on the condition that the Plan is terminated by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”). If the termination of the Plan is not approved, the Hospital may request that its request for a waiver of the minimum funding standard for the Plan for the plan year ending November 30, [illegible], be re-opened for consideration.

The conditional waivers of the 100 percent tax have been granted in accordance with section 3002(b) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). The amounts for which the conditional waivers have been granted are equal to 100 percent of the accumulated funding deficiencies in the funding standard account as of November 30, [illegible], through [illegible], and the aggregate unpaid minimum required contributions as of November 30, [illegible], the end of the plan years for which the waivers have been granted, to the extent such funding deficiencies or aggregate unpaid minimum required contributions have not been corrected.

200921033

Effective August 1, 2008, the Hospital ceased benefit accruals for all participants who had not previously ceased to accrue benefits under the Plan. On November 4, [illegible], the Hospital filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Since the filing of the bankruptcy petition, the Hospital has remained in possession and management of its business and property as a debtor-in-possession pursuant to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

In connection with the filing of the bankruptcy petition, the Hospital entered into an agreement with the Buyer under which the Buyer or one or more of its controlled affiliates will purchase substantially all of the operating assets of the Hospital and its affiliates (conditioned on the approval of the bankruptcy court). As a result of the sale, substantially all of the employees of the Hospital will terminate employment with the Hospital and will become employed by the Buyer or one of its controlled affiliates. It is anticipated that the purchase will occur during the spring of [illegible]. Following the Buyer's

purchase of substantially all of the operating assets of the Hospital, the Hospital will be liquidated.

One of the conditions of the sale of the Hospital's assets to the Buyer is that the PBGC assume responsibility for the Plan, pursuant to either a distress termination of the Plan under Section 4041 of ERISA or an involuntary termination of the Plan by the PBGC under Section 4042 of ERISA. The Hospital anticipates that it will resolve the procedure for the PBGC's assumption of the Plan prior to the sale to the Buyer.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

We have sent a copy of this letter to the Manager,
to the Manager, and to your
authorized representative pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office.

If you require further assistance in this matter, please contact Sincerely yours,

Andrew E. Zuckerman, Director
Employee Plans Rulings & Agreements

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace