PLR 200921020: Mine sublessee was the sole producer of Indian coal

Number
200921020
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Electricity Produced from Certain Renewable Sources
Code sections
§ 45, § 7871
Ruling dated
February 12, 2009
Publicly released
May 22, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A coal company planned to sublease its interests in two tribal mining leases to a partnership that would extract and sell coal while paying royalties to the tribe. The coal reserves were held in trust by the United States for the tribe, and the Bureau of Indian Affairs had approved the leases and sublease. The partnership had two members, including a special-purpose investor entity. The IRS concluded that the partnership would be the sole producer of Indian coal under section 45 because it was the sublessee entitled to extract and sell the coal. It also explained that section 45(d)(10) did not require the producer of Indian coal to own the production facility.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would the sublessee partnership be the sole producer of all Indian coal produced under the tribal-reserve sublease?
  • Outcome: Approved: the partnership was treated as the sole producer for section 45 purposes.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 45(c)(9), 45(d)(10), 45(e)(10), 7871(c)(3)(E)(ii).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200921020
[Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 5/22/2009
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 45.00-00
-----------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
----------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
----------------------------------------- CC:PSI:B06
------------------
PLR-143340-08
-------------------------
Date:
February 12, 2009

LEGEND:

Corp A = ----------------------------------------
Corp B = -------------------------------
Corp C = ---------------------------
Corp D = -------------------------
Corp E = --------------------------------
Corp F = -------------
Mine = --------------------
City = ----------------------
Tribe = ---------------
a = -------
b = -------
c = -------------
d = -------------------
e = -------------------------
f = -------------------------
g = ----
h = ---------------------------
i = ------------------
j = ---------------------------
k = --------------------------
l = ------
m = ------
n = -------

Dear --------------:

This is in response to your letter dated October 3, 2008, supplemented by additional letters, with regard to a ruling requested relating to the production and sale of coal from
PLR-143340-08
2

an Indian production coal facility under section 45(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).

Facts
Corp A, a wholly owned subsidiary of Corp B and a member of the Corp B consolidated group, is engaged in the business of producing and selling coal from Mine, a single pit surface mine complex located near City on property leased from Tribe.

Corp C will produce and sell coal reserves from Mine.

Corp D is a special purpose subsidiary of Corp A organized to own an interest in Corp C.

Corp E (an investor) is a special purpose company that is a disregarded entity for federal income tax purposes. Corp E was organized in order to own an interest in Corp C. Corp E is owned by Corp F. Corp F is a S corporation engaged (through subsidiaries almost all of which are disregarded entities) in various lines of businesses.

The Tribe is an Indian Tribe within the meaning of section 7871(c)(3)(E)(ii) of the Code. Since a the United States has held in trust for the Tribe the coal reserves underlying the Mine located near City. In b, Corp A entered into mining leases with the Tribe with respect to reserves at the Mine. Corp A has owned the working interest in the Mine and has produced and sold coal from those reserves continuously since c.

On d, the reserves at the Mine were held in trust by the United States for the Tribe.

Corp A currently leases certain of the Mine reserves pursuant to a lease dated e, as amended, between the Tribe and Corp A. Under this lease, Corp A operates the Mine to remove exclusively Tribal coal from the Mine reserves, and the Tribe retains a royalty based upon specified percentages of revenues from the sale of coal produced from the Tribal Mine reserves.

Corp A and the Tribe executed a second lease dated f, which was approved by the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs (the BIA). In a letter dated h, the BIA approved the second lease conditioned upon compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act. This second lease provides Corp A with access to coal reserves underlying property that is to the south of, and adjacent to, the lands on which coal is currently being mined pursuant to the first lease. The reserves at the Mine subject to the second lease are part of the same mineral deposit from which Corp A extracts coal under the first lease. Under the second lease, as under the first lease, Corp A will operate the Mine to extract exclusively Tribal coal from the reserves and the Tribe will retain a royalty based upon specified percentages of revenues from coal sales.
PLR-143340-08
3

Corp C was formed on i by Corp A. At the time of its formation, Corp C was a disregarded entity for federal income tax purposes. On or about j, Corp A transferred a g interest in Corp C to Corp D. As a result of this contribution, Corp C had two members (Corp A and Corp D), and therefore became a partnership for federal income tax purposes.

Corp A will sublease to Corp C in a single sublease, its leasehold interests in the Mine reserves under both the first and second leases. Under the sublease Corp C will assume Corp A’s obligation to pay the royalty to the Tribe based upon specified percentages of coal sales. The sublease has been approved by the BIA. Under the sublease, Corp C will be entitled to extract and sell a certain amount of coal from the Mine reserves. Pursuant to the sublease, Corp C will agree to pay Corp A a certain dollar amount per year, with the final payment made on k.

Corp A sold its l interest in Corp C to Corp E.

Corp E will generally be entitled to l of distributions from operations paid by Corp C to its members until Corp E has achieved an m internal rate of return on the equity payment (Payout). Corp E will generally be entitled to n of distributions from operations after Payout. It is not anticipated that Payout will occur during the term of the sublease.

Issue
Whether Corp C will be the sole producer (as that term is used in section 45(e)(10)(A) of the Code) of Indian coal from an Indian coal production facility (as that term is used in section 45(d)(10) of the Code) with respect to all of the production under the sublease from the Tribe reserves.

Law and Analysis
Section 45(d)(10) of the Code provides that in the case of a facility that produces Indian coal, the term “Indian coal production facility” means a facility which is placed in service before January 1, 2009.

Section 45(c)(9)(A)of the Code provides that the term “Indian coal” means coal which is produced from coal reserves which, on June 14, 2005 (i) were owned by an Indian tribe, or (ii) were held in trust by the United States for the benefit of an Indian tribe or its members.

Section 45(c)(9)(B) of the Code provides that for purposes of this paragraph, the term “Indian tribe” has the meaning given such term by section 7871(c)(3)(E)(ii).

Section 45(e)(10) of the Code provides, in part, in the case of a producer of Indian coal at an Indian coal production facility, such coal must be sold to an unrelated person.
PLR-143340-08
4

Certain facilities described in section 45(d) of the Code must also be owned by the producer of the electricity . See, for example, section 45(d)(1) in the case of a wind facility. Other provisions provide that the producer of electricity at the facility need not be the owner of the facility. See, for example, sections 45(d)(2)(B)(iii) and (d)(3)(B) in the case of closed loop and open loop biomass facilities. In the instant case, section 45(d)(10) does not require the producer of Indian coal at the facility to own such facility as well.

Accordingly, we conclude that since Corp C is the sublessee and is entitled to extract and sell a certain amount of coal from the Mine reserves, Corp C will be the sole producer (as that term is used in section 45(e)(10)(A) of the Code)) from an Indian coal production facility (as that term is used in section 45(d)(10) of the Code) with respect to all of the production under the sublease from the Tribe reserves.

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal income tax consequences of the above described facts under any other provision of the Code or regulations

Sincerely,

Peter C Friedman
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 6
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace