CCA 200920052: Self-employed taxpayers need evidence of unemployment eligibility for the medical-insurance exception

Number
200920052
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Annuities: Endowment and Life Insurance (Included v. Not Included in Gross Income)
Code sections
§ 72
Ruling dated
April 8, 2009
Publicly released
May 15, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel explained the section 72(t)(2)(D) exception for certain retirement-plan distributions used to pay medical-insurance costs after a job loss. The individual generally must have received unemployment compensation for 12 consecutive weeks, take the distribution during the year that compensation is paid or the following year, and limit the exception to insurance costs paid during the tax year. A self-employed person can satisfy the unemployment-compensation condition by showing that federal or state law would have allowed benefits but for the person’s self-employment. Counsel therefore said a self-employed taxpayer must provide evidence of that eligibility. The email also noted that no regulations had been issued and pointed to a Tax Court summary opinion while cautioning that it was not precedent.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What must a self-employed taxpayer show to use the section 72(t)(2)(D) medical-insurance exception?
  • Outcome: Advice given: the taxpayer must present evidence that unemployment compensation would have been available under federal or state law but for self-employment.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 72(t)(2)(D); Tax Court Summary Opinion 2005-78.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2009040814001550 Number: 200920052
Release Date: 5/15/2009
Office: --------------------------
UILC: 72.00-00

From: --------------------
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 2:00:19 PM
To: ----------------------
Cc: --------------------
Subject: RE: 72(t) exceptions

-----------

There have not been any regulations issued regarding section 72(t)(2)(D).

A distribution qualifies under section 72(t)(2)(D) if it was made from an individual retirement plan to an individual after separation from employment:

(1) If such individual has received unemployment compensation for 12 consecutive weeks under any Federal or State unemployment compensation law by reason of such separation, sec. 72(t)(2)(D)(i)(I);

(2) if such distribution was made during any taxable year during which such unemployment compensation is paid or the succeeding taxable year, sec. 72(t)(2)(D)(i)(II); and

(3) to the extent such distribution does not exceed the amount paid during the taxable year for insurance, sec. 72(t)(2)(D)(i)(III).

A self-employed individual shall be treated as having satisfied the requirement of section 72(t)(2)(D)(i)(I) (number (1) above) if, under Federal or State law, the individual would have received unemployment compensation but for the fact that the individual was self-employed. Sec. 72(t)(2)(D)(iii). Thus, if the taxpayer is self-employed, the taxpayer has to present evidence that he would have been eligible to receive any Federal or State unemployment compensation, but for the fact that the taxpayer was self employed.

Although not able to cite as precedence, see the attached Tax Court Summary Opinion 2005-78 and how the Tax Court handled a S case dealing with section 72(t)(2)(D)(iii).

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace