CCA 200920048: Unclear summons facts did not support suspending the assessment period

Number
200920048
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Suspension of Statute of Limitations
Code sections
§ 6501, § 7609
Ruling dated
April 6, 2009
Publicly released
May 15, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel considered whether section 7609(e) suspended the period for assessing tax against certain individuals. The email said suspension would require the individuals to have been entitled to and given notice under section 7609(a), followed by an exercise of the right to intervene or start a proceeding to quash. On the limited facts provided, Counsel could not say those conditions had been met and concluded that suspension did not appear to apply. Counsel preferred obtaining written consent to extend the assessment period under section 6501(c)(4) or issuing a statutory notice of deficiency. That approach avoided depending on a suspension argument whose factual basis was uncertain.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did section 7609(e) suspend the assessment limitations period on the undisclosed summons facts?
  • Outcome: Advice given: suspension did not appear to apply, and the IRS should use a consent extension or notice of deficiency rather than rely on the uncertain argument.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6501(c)(4), 7609(a), 7609(e).

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2009040613383251 Number: 200920048
Release Date: 5/15/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 7609.04-00

From: -------------------
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 1:38:34 PM
To: ------------------
Cc:
Subject: 7609 question

Hello,

Given the facts you provided, it would not appear that 7609(e) would suspend the period of limitations to assess tax for the individuals at issue. For 7609(e) to apply, the individuals would have had to been entitled to and provided notice under 7609(a), and then the taxpayer would have had to exercise the right to intervene or begin a proceeding to quash under 7069(b). Without more information, we can not say that these conditions have been satisfied.

Generally, we prefer to get written consent to extend the period of limitations under 6501(c)(4) or to send out the SNOD than to rely on a legal argument that the period of limitations has been suspended where it is unclear whether the facts support such an argument.

Please contact me if you have any further questions.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace