PLR 200919069: Adviser errors and impaired capacity justified waivers for three IRA distributions

Number
200919069
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Rollover Contributions
Code sections
§ 72, § 401, § 408, § 6110
Ruling dated
February 10, 2009
Publicly released
May 8, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An 83-year-old individual received distributions after a financial adviser recommended liquidating three annuities without explaining that they were IRAs or that other options were available. The individual deposited all three amounts in a non-IRA account. During the rollover periods, a medical condition affected memory and diminished mental capacity, increasing reliance on the adviser and an associate. The IRS found that adviser errors and the medical condition caused the missed deadlines. It waived the 60-day requirement and granted 60 days from the ruling date to place all three amounts in an eligible rollover IRA. The relief did not cover any amount required to be distributed under section 401(a)(9).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer receive rollover waivers for three IRA distributions after adviser errors and a medical condition prevented timely rollovers?
  • Outcome: Approved: the IRS granted 60 days from the ruling date to contribute all three amounts to an eligible rollover IRA.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 72, 401(a)(9), 408(d)(1), 408(d)(3), 6110(k)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

200919069

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

FEB 10 2009

UIL No. 408.03-00

SE:T:EP:RA:T4

Legend:

Taxpayer A =

Individual B =

IRA X =

IRA Y =

IRA Z =

Account A =

Company R =

Company S =

Company T =

Financial Advisor C =

Individual D =

Amount A =

Amount B =

Amount C =

Date 1 =

Page 2 of 5

200919069

Date 2 =

Dear:

This is in response to your letter dated September 9, 2008, supplemented by correspondence dated October 10, 2008, submitted on your behalf by your authorized representative, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in support of the ruling requested.

Taxpayer A, age 83, represents that she received distributions of Amount A from IRA X, Amount B from IRA Y, and Amount C from IRA Z. Taxpayer A asserts that her failure to accomplish timely rollovers within the 60-day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) of the Code was due to errors committed by her financial advisor and her medical condition, which impaired her ability to accomplish timely rollover of Amounts A, B and C.

Taxpayer A represents that she was not aware that Individual B's annuities were IRAs. Taxpayer A further represents that on Date 1 she met with Financial Advisor C and his client associate, Individual D, who advised her to liquidate the annuities held by Company R. Financial Advisor C and Individual D did not advise Taxpayer A that the annuities were IRAs or that she had options other than liquidation. In addition, the forms that Taxpayer A completed did not contain any statement that the annuities were IRAs. Taxpayer A received Amounts A and B in connection with the liquidation of IRAs X and Y and deposited these amounts into Account A, a non-IRA account with Company T.

Taxpayer A represents that shortly before Date 2 she again met with Financial Advisor C and Individual D, who advised her to liquidate the annuity held by Company S. Financial Advisor C and Individual D assisted Taxpayer A in completing the appropriate forms to request liquidation of IRA Z. However, Financial Advisor C and Individual D did not advise Taxpayer A that the annuity was an IRA or that she had options other than liquidation. In addition, the forms that Taxpayer A completed did not contain any statement that the annuity was an IRA. On Date 2 Taxpayer A received Amount C in connection with the liquidation of IRA Z and deposited this amount into Account A.

Taxpayer A also represents that during the 60-day periods following the distributions she suffered from a medical condition that affected her memory and diminished her mental capacity. Thus, she relied on Financial Advisor C and Individual D to provide her with appropriate advice and assistance.

Page 3 of 5

200919069

Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Code, with respect to the distributions of Amounts A, B and C from IRAs X, Y and Z respectively.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section 72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit the IRA is maintained if

(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at any time during the one-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section 408(d) does not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the

Page 4 of 5

200919069

Code where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I), the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error; (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

The information and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is consistent with her assertion that her failure to accomplish timely rollovers of Amounts A, B and C within the 60-day rollover periods was due to errors committed by her financial advisor and her medical condition, which impaired her ability to accomplish timely rollovers of Amounts A, B and C.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amounts A, B and C from IRAs X, Y and Z. Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this ruling letter to contribute Amounts A, B and C into an eligible rollover IRA. Provided all other requirements of section 408(d)(3) of the Code, except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such contribution, Amounts A, B and C will be considered rollover contributions within the meaning of section 408(d)(3) of the Code.

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be distributed by section 401(a)(9) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter ruling has been sent to your authorized representative pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact , at (202) . Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T4.

Page 5 of 5

200919069

Sincerely yours,

Donzell H. Littlejohn, Manager
Employee Plans, Technical Group 4

Enclosures:
Deleted Copy of Ruling Letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

CC:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace