PLR 200915032: Revised dividend terms did not affect an earlier ruling

Number
200915032
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Distributions of Property; Distributions in Lieu of Money
Code sections
§ 301, § 305
Ruling dated
January 8, 2009
Publicly released
April 10, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer asked the IRS to supplement an earlier ruling about a special dividend under sections 301 and 305. Shareholders could elect cash, stock of equivalent value under a modified formula, or a combination, subject to an overall cash limit. The taxpayer could instead decide before payment to pay the dividend entirely in cash and could determine the election for a shareholder who did not submit a valid choice. The IRS ruled that these revised or additional facts did not adversely affect the earlier rulings, which remained fully effective.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the revised election and payment terms for a special cash-or-stock dividend affect the earlier ruling?
  • Outcome: Approved: the changes had no adverse effect, and the earlier rulings remained in full force.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 301, 305.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200915032
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/10/2009
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 301.00-00, 305.03-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------, ID No. -------------
---------------------------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------------------
---------------------
-----------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:B05
PLR-153784-08
Date:
January 08, 2009

Legend

Date1 = --------------------------

Date2 = -----------------------

Dear ------------------:

This letter responds to your request dated December 19, 2008, that we supplement our letter ruling dated September 10, 2008 (PLR-130349-08) (the “Prior Letter Ruling”). The legend abbreviations in the Prior Letter Ruling are incorporated by reference into this letter.

The Prior Letter Ruling addresses the federal tax consequences of a proposed distribution with respect to Taxpayer’s stock (the “Special Dividend”) under Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) sections 301 and 305.

Except as stated herein, the facts with respect to the Special Dividend are as described in the Prior Letter Ruling.

The declaration and payment dates of the Special Dividend are Date1 and Date2, respectively.

While each stockholder will be entitled to elect to receive cash, Common Stock of equivalent value (determined under a modified formula), or a combination thereof, subject to the overall cash limit, Taxpayer will retain the right to pay the Special Dividend solely in cash if it so decides prior to the payment date. (In such latter event, any stockholder electing to receive 100 percent cash, as well as all other stockholders, will receive their entire entitlement in cash).

PLR-153784-08
2

If a stockholder fails to make a valid election by the election deadline, the stockholder will be deemed to have made an election to be determined by Taxpayer at Taxpayer’s sole discretion.

RULING

Based on the information and representations submitted for the Prior Letter Ruling and this supplemental letter, we rule that the changes or additions in facts will have no adverse effect on the rulings contained in the Prior Letter Ruling, and that all such rulings will remain in full force and effect.

CAVEATS

No opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In particular, no opinion is expressed with regard to whether Taxpayer qualifies as a REIT under subchapter M of the Code. Furthermore, no opinion is expressed with regard to whether the Special Dividend constitutes a Preferential Dividend under section 562(c) of the Code.

PROCEDURAL STATEMENTS

This supplemental ruling letter is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it.
Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

Pursuant to the power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this supplemental ruling letter will be sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

______
T. Ian Russell
Senior Counsel, Branch 5
Office of Associate Counsel
(Corporate)

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace