PLR 200915005: Corporation kept S status after two trusts missed ESBT elections

Number
200915005
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 170, § 1361, § 1362
Ruling dated
December 19, 2008
Publicly released
April 10, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Two trusts became shareholders of an S corporation without timely electing treatment as electing small business trusts, causing the corporation's S election to terminate. The corporation represented that the missed elections were not intended to end S status and were not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. The IRS found the termination inadvertent under section 1362(f) and allowed the corporation to continue as an S corporation from the termination date. The relief required each trustee to file an ESBT election, with the distinct effective date specified for each trust, within 60 days of the ruling. The trusts also had to file any amended returns needed to follow the ruling, and the corporation and shareholders had to make any required adjustments consistent with continuous S status.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation retain S status after two shareholder trusts failed to make timely ESBT elections?
  • Outcome: Approved: the termination was inadvertent, subject to remedial ESBT elections, any necessary amended returns, and consistent S corporation treatment.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361 and 1362; Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200915005
Release Date: 4/10/2009
Index Number: 1362.04-00

--------------------------------------
Person To Contact:
------------------------
-------------------------, ID No. -------------
--------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------ --------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B01 – PLR-129450-08
Date:
December 19, 2008

X = --------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

Date 1 = ----------------------

Date 2 = --------------------------

Date 3 = ----------------------

Trust 1 = ---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------

Trust 2 = --------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------

Dear ------------:

This responds to a letter dated June 4, 2008, submitted on behalf of X, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code for an inadvertent termination of S election.

Facts

X elected to be taxed as an S corporation effective Date 1. On Date 2, Trust 1 and Trust 2 became shareholders of X. Because no election was made to treat Trust 1 or Trust 2 as Electing Small Business Trusts (ESBT), on Date 2, Trust 1 and Trust 2 were ineligible shareholders. As a result, X's S corporation election terminated on Date 2.

PLR-129450-08
2

X represents that there was no intent to terminate X’s S corporation election and that the failure to file timely the ESBT elections for Trust 1 and Trust 2 was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X represents that Trust 1 and Trust 2 each comply with the requirements under § 1361(e), which defines an ESBT.

X and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments required by the Secretary consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation.

Law and Analysis

Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term "S corporation" means, with respect to any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for such year.

Section 1361(b)(1) defines a "small business corporation" as a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not (A) have more than 75 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than one class of stock.

Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the taxable year for which the corporation is an S corporation) the corporation ceases to be a small business corporation.

Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) provides that, for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), a trust all of which is treated (under subpart E of part I of subchapter J of chapter 1) as owned by an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States may be a shareholder.

Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) and § 1.1361-1(h)(1)(ii) provide that, for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), a trust that is described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) immediately before the death of the deemed owner and that continues in existence after such death is a permitted shareholder, but only for the two-year period beginning on the day of the deemed owner's death. Section 1.1361-1(h)(3)(i)(B) provides that if stock is held by a trust described in § 1.1361-1(h)(1)(ii), the estate of the deemed owner is generally treated as the shareholder as of the day of the deemed owner's death.

Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(v) states that an ESBT is a permissible shareholder of an S corporation.

Section 1361(e)(1) defines an ESBT, in part, as a trust if --

PLR-129450-08
3

(i) such trust does not have as a beneficiary any person other than (I) an individual, (II) an estate, (III) an organization described in paragraph (2), (3), (4), or (5) of § 170(c), or (IV) an organization described in § 170(c)(1) which holds a contingent interest in such trust and is not a potential current beneficiary,

(ii) no interest in such trust was acquired by purchase, and

(iii) an election under this subsection applies to such trust.

Section 1361(e)(3) provides that an election to be an ESBT shall be made by the trustee. Any such election shall be applied to the taxable year of the trust for which made and all subsequent taxable years of such trust unless revoked with the consent of the Secretary.

Section 1362(f) provides, in relevant part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361 (b) or to obtain shareholder consents, (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in ineffectiveness, steps were taken so that the corporation is once more a small business corporation, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make any adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to the period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness, the corporation shall be treated as continuing to be an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Conclusion

Based solely on the representations made and the information submitted, we conclude that X’s S election terminated on Date 2 because the trustees of Trust 1 and Trust 2 failed to timely file and complete the required ESBT elections under section 1361(e)(3). We further conclude, however, that the termination was an inadvertent termination within the meaning of section 1362(f). Pursuant to the provisions of section 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation on and after Date 2, unless X’s S election is otherwise terminated under section 1362(d), provided that the respective trustee files an ESBT election with the appropriate service center within 60 days of the date of this letter effective Date 3 for Trust 1 and Date 2 for Trust 2 and, accordingly, that Trust 1 and Trust 2 file any amended returns that are necessary to comply with this ruling. A copy of this letter should be attached to the ESBT elections.

Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed on: (1) Whether X is otherwise eligible to be

PLR-129450-08
4

treated as an S corporation; and (2) Whether Trust 1 or Trust 2 are eligible ESBTs under section 1361(e).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer(s) requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your representative.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Sincerely,

David R. Haglund

David R. Haglund
Senior Technician Reviewer
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace