CCA 200914039: A defaulted deficiency notice did not prevent extending the assessment period

Number
200914039
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Limitations on Assessment and Collection (Barred v. Not Barred)
Code sections
§ 6501
Ruling dated
March 5, 2009
Publicly released
April 3, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel considered whether a taxpayer and the IRS could extend the assessment limitations period after the IRS issued a statutory notice of deficiency on which the taxpayer defaulted. The advice found no rule prohibiting such an agreement. Under section 6501(c)(4), the parties could execute an extension as long as the limitations period was still open at that time. The short email provides no additional facts about the assessment or proposed extension.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer and IRS extend the assessment period after issuance and default of a statutory notice of deficiency?
  • Outcome: Advice given: yes, provided the limitations period remained open when the extension was executed.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6501(c)(4).

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2009030514582452 Number: 200914039
Release Date: 4/3/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6501.00-00

From: -----------------------
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:58:33 PM
To: ------------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: Defaulted SND status

This follows up my voicemail message confirming that nothing prohibits the taxpayer and the Service from
agreeing to extend the assessment statute of limitations under section 6501(c)(4) after the issuance of a
SND (on which the taxpayer defaults) provided the limitations period is still open when the extension is
executed.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace