CCA 200914028: A trust and its beneficiary generally needed separate limitations consents

Number
200914028
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Extension by Agreement
Code sections
§ 6229
Ruling dated
September 10, 2008
Publicly released
April 3, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel addressed limitations-period consents for partnership income passing through a trust to beneficiaries. The trust was taxable on income it retained, while beneficiaries were taxable on distributed income, creating two potential taxpayers who each needed a Form 872-i. A consent from the beneficiary was always required unless that beneficiary was a nontaxable charity. If the IRS had a valid Form 872-P, however, it did not need separate Forms 872-i for partnership income flowing to indirect partners.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Which consents were needed when partnership income flowed through a trust to a beneficiary?
  • Outcome: Advice given: obtain Forms 872-i from both potential taxpayers, subject to the charitable-beneficiary and valid-Form-872-P exceptions stated in the email.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6229; Forms 872-P and 872-i.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-310151-09 Number: 200914028
Release Date: 4/3/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6229.02-00

From: -------------------
Sent: Wed 9/10/2008 9:29 AM
To: ------------------------------
Cc: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: TEFRA

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The trust is taxable to the extent it does not distribute income and the beneficiaries are taxable to the extent the income is distributed. Since you have two potential taxpayers, you need two Forms 872-i.

I agree that we would always need a Form 872-i from the beneficiary unless the beneficiary is a non- taxable charity.

If you have a valid Form 872-P, you don't need any Forms 872-i for partnership income flowing to indirect partners. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace