CCA 200914026: A trust's consent did not extend its beneficiaries' assessment periods

Number
200914026
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Extension by Agreement
Code sections
§ 1374, § 6229
Ruling dated
September 8, 2008
Publicly released
April 3, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised on several limitations-period consents for direct and indirect partners. A trust could not extend a beneficiary's assessment period, so the IRS needed Forms 872-i from beneficiaries taxable on partnership adjustments passing through a grantor or complex trust, unless it relied on a partnership-level Form 872-P. Counsel thought a parent could probably be listed with "and subsidiaries" rather than naming every subsidiary, provided the signature showed the officer also signed for the partner-subsidiary, but deferred that point to another official. No Form 872 was needed from an S corporation unless the IRS intended to tax built-in gain under section 1374 or otherwise tax it as a C corporation. The email cited Bufferd v. Commissioner for the S corporation conclusion.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Which limitation-extension forms were needed for trust beneficiaries, subsidiaries, and an S corporation affected by partnership adjustments?
  • Outcome: Advice given: obtain or rely on consents that bind the actually taxable partners, and obtain an S corporation consent only if the corporation itself may owe tax.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1374 and 6229; Bufferd v. Commissioner; Forms 872, 872-P, and 872-i.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-310159-09 Number: 200914026
Release Date: 4/3/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6229.02-00

From: -------------------
Sent: Mon 9/8/2008 11:15 AM
To: ------------------------------
Cc: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: TEFRA

1 - 3. These look fine.

  1. The trust has no power to extend the period for assessing any beneficiary. So if the trust is a grantor
    trust or is a complex trust that has distributable net income ("DNI") that will be taxable to the beneficiaries based on the partnership item adjustments, you will need to secure Forms 872-i from the beneficiaries. Alternatively, you can rely on the Form 872-P signed at the partnership level to assess the direct and indirect partners.

  2. I think it is probably fine to simply list the parent "and subsidiaries" rather than naming each individual
    subsidiary. The signature line should reflect, however, that the officer is also signing as an officer of the partner-subsidiary as you indicate. This is -------- call, so I will leave this issue to ------------------------in ------
    -----.

  3. You don't need a Form 872 from the S corporation unless you intend to tax it for built in gain under
    section 1374 or otherwise tax it as a C corporation. The Supreme Court so held in Bufferd v. Commissioner.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace