PLR 200914018: A one-time retiree-health waiver election did not create constructive receipt

Number
200914018
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
General Rule for Taxable Year of Inclusion (Year Received v. Not Year Received)
Code sections
§ 451
Ruling dated
December 19, 2008
Publicly released
April 3, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An employer agreed to let represented employees make a one-time irrevocable election to waive future retiree health coverage in exchange for a higher pay rate. Current employees had to elect by a fixed date, and future eligible employees had 15 days after their first contracted workday. The pay increase applied only to future services and did not create additional compensation for completed payroll periods. The IRS ruled that merely offering this election did not cause employees who retained the health benefit to constructively receive income under section 451.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did access to a one-time irrevocable election between future retiree health benefits and higher prospective pay cause constructive receipt of income?
  • Outcome: Approved: the election's availability alone did not put employees in constructive receipt of income.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 451(a); Treas. Reg. § 1.451-2(a).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200914018
Release Date: 4/3/2009
Third Party Communication: -----
Index Number: 451.00-00
Date of Communication: -------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Person To Contact:
------------
---------------------------------------
--------------------------, ID No. ----------------
------------------------------------
-----------------
---------------------------------
Telephone Number:

---------------------
Refer Reply To:

CC:TEGE:EB:HW
PLR-144501-08

Date:

December 19, 2008

Legend

Taxpayer = ---------------------------------------
-----------------------

Association = ------------------------------------------

Agreement = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear -----------------:

This is in reply to the letter from your authorized representative dated February 15, 2008, and subsequent correspondence, requesting a ruling on behalf of Taxpayer.

According to the information provided, Taxpayer currently provides retiree health insurance benefits to certain employees represented by Association. Taxpayer has entered into Agreement with Association that certain employees of Taxpayer will have a one-time irrevocable election to waive retirement health insurance in exchange for a higher rate of pay. According to Agreement, to exercise the one-time election, a current employee must sign an irrevocable waiver of the retirement health insurance benefit by a fixed date in order to elect the increased pay rate. Future eligible employees must execute the one-time irrevocable waiver within 15 days of their first contracted day of
PLR-144501-08
2

work as an employee of Taxpayer to elect the increased pay rate. Employees who do not exercise the one-time irrevocable election to waive the right to the retirement health insurance benefits by the fixed date or within 15 days of their first contracted day of work will not be allowed to waive the retirement health insurance benefit at any later date.

Taxpayer represents that the increase in an employee’s rate of pay resulting from the irrevocable waiver of retirement health insurance will apply only on a prospective basis. Employees who irrevocably elect to forgo future health benefits will not receive additional salary or taxable compensation for payroll periods for which the employee has already been paid.

Section 451(a) of the Internal Revenue Code states that the amount of any item of gross income shall be included in the gross income for the taxable year in which received by the taxpayer, unless, under the method of accounting used in computing taxable income, such amount is to be properly accounted for as of a different period.

Section 1.451-2(a) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that income although not actually reduced to a taxpayer’s possession is constructively received by him in the taxable year during which it is credited to his account, set apart for him or otherwise made available so that he may draw upon it at any time, or so that he could have drawn upon it during the taxable year if notice of intention to withdraw had been given. However, income is not constructively received if the taxpayer’s control of its receipt is subject to substantial limitations or restrictions.

Based on the representations made and authorities cited above, we conclude that an employee will not be in constructive receipt of income due solely to the availability of the one-time irrevocable election to waive retiree health benefits in return for an increase in the rate of pay for future services provided to Taxpayer.

No opinion is expressed as to the federal tax consequences of the transaction under any other section of the Code or statute other than those specifically stated above.

This ruling is directed only to the Taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Harry Beker
Branch Chief, Health and Welfare Branch
Office of Division Counsel/Associate
Chief Counsel
(Tax Exempt & Government Entities)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace