CCA 200913047: Partnership assets were not generally attributed to a partner

Number
200913047
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Sale of Personal Property
Topics
Code sections
§ 863
Ruling dated
November 12, 2008
Publicly released
March 27, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel considered attribution of a partnership's production activity and assets to a partner. It advised that those items were attributed only in determining the partner's distributive share of partnership income, which the email linked to a redacted cost-plus amount. Partnership assets otherwise were not attributed to the partner. That remained the conclusion even if the taxpayer was treated as a manufacturer under the referenced new Subpart F principles.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Were a partnership's assets generally attributed to a partner under the referenced Subpart F manufacturing principles?
  • Outcome: Advice given: no, attribution was limited to determining the partner's distributive share of partnership income.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 863; referenced Subpart F principles.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-111213-08 Number: 200913047
Release Date: 3/27/2009
Office: ------------------
UILC: 863.02-01

From: -------------------
Sent: 11/12/2008 1:52 PM
To: -----------------
Cc: ----------------------------
Subject: [------]

ok--interesting. I looked at the partnership rules--only the activity of a partnership--i.e., production activity-
-and assets of a partnership are attributed to a partner in determining the partner's distributive share of partnership income--so that would just be the cost plus --% amount you mentioned....so partnership assets would not otherwise be attributed even if the taxpayer were to be considered to be a manufacturer under these new Sub F principles. Thanks--I will get back to you!

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace