CCA 200913041: Converted partnership items were no longer subject to TEFRA
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel addressed a parent-subsidiary consent issue involving items that had been partnership items. The advice states that once those items converted to nonpartnership items, they were no longer governed by the TEFRA partnership procedures. The writer also agreed with a second conclusion presented by the recipient, while noting that the proposed step arguably was unnecessary. Extensive redactions prevent a more specific description of that second conclusion.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did TEFRA continue to apply after partnership items became nonpartnership items, and was a proposed second step needed?
- Outcome: Advice given: TEFRA no longer applied, and the writer agreed with the second conclusion while questioning whether the step was necessary.
- Key authorities: IRC § 6231; TEFRA partnership procedures.
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA-929943-08 Number: 200913041
Release Date: 3/27/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6231.13-00
From: -------------------
Sent: Mon 9/29/2008 9:43 AM
To: -----------------
Cc: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: Parent-Subsidiary Consent Issue
(1) Once the partnership items converted to nonpartnership items, they are no longer subject to the
TEFRA provisions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
(2) I agree with your second conclusion, although arguably it would not be necessary.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace