CCA 200913014: A courtesy TEFRA notice did not restart the 120-day period

Number
200913014
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Notice to Partners of Proceedings
Code sections
§ 6223
Ruling dated
June 18, 2008
Publicly released
March 27, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel approved sending a replacement notice beginning a TEFRA administrative proceeding as a courtesy. Because the original notice had been properly sent, the replacement would not restart the 120-day waiting period for a final partnership administrative adjustment. Even if the replacement counted as the first notice, an adjustment issued during that period would not be invalid. Instead, section 6223(e) would let the partner elect to convert partnership items to nonpartnership items within 45 days after receiving the adjustment, after which the IRS would have one year to issue a deficiency notice.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would a courtesy replacement notice restart the 120-day TEFRA period or invalidate an adjustment issued during that period?
  • Outcome: Advice given: it would not restart the period, and even a premature adjustment would trigger the partner's conversion-election remedy rather than become invalid.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6223(e).

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-618222-08 Number: 200913014
Release Date: 3/27/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6223.00-00

From: -------------------
Sent: Wed 6/18/2008 4:22 PM
To: --------------------
Cc: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: TEFRA Proceedings returned NBAP

I have no problem with sending a new NBAP as a courtesy. It will not restart the 120 day period since the
NBAP was previously properly sent in accordance with the statute and regulation.

Even if it were to be considered the first NBAP implicating the 120 rule, this would not invalidate any
FPAA issued within the 120 period. Under section 6223(e), partner would just have an option to file an
election converting his partnership items to nonpartnership items within 45 days of receiving the FPAA.
We would then have one year to issue a converted item notice of deficiency.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

As a policy matter we always want to make sure taxpayers receive actual notice.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace