CCA 200911030: The new disclosure rule did not change TEFRA proceeding disclosures

Number
200911030
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Use of Information in Judicial or Administrative Nontax Proceedings; Disclosure of Partnership Return
Code sections
§ 6103
Ruling dated
February 6, 2009
Publicly released
March 13, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised that the amendment adding section 6103(e)(10) should not affect disclosures in TEFRA partnership proceedings under section 6103(h)(4)(A). That provision allows taxpayer information to be disclosed to parties in a federal judicial or administrative proceeding, and all direct and indirect partners are parties to a TEFRA audit and resulting litigation. The IRS could therefore continue issuing Form 886-Z under the proceeding exception. The advice nevertheless recommended protecting partner information that was not directly relevant to the proceeding.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the new section 6103(e)(10) rule change disclosures made during TEFRA partnership audits and litigation?
  • Outcome: Advice given: no, the IRS could continue issuing Form 886-Z under section 6103(h)(4)(A).
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6103(e)(10) and 6103(h)(4)(A); Abelein v. U.S., 323 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir. 2003).

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2009020615524437 Number: 200911030
Release Date: 3/13/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6103.09-03, 6103.05-03

From: -------------------
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 3:52:45 PM
To: ----------------------------
Cc: ---------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: New I.R.C. § 6103(e)(10)

The amendment to section 6103(e) should not affect any disclosures in TEFRA proceedings under section 6103(h)(4)(A). Section 6103(h)(4)(A) provides that taxpayer information may be disclosed to all parties in a federal judicial or administrative proceeding. All direct and indirect partners in a TEFRA partnership are parties to the administrative proceeding (i.e., the audit) and the subsequent litigation. The 9th Circuit so held in Abelein v. U.S., 323 F.3d 1210, 91 A.F.T.R.2d 2003-1476, 2003-1 USTC P 50,331. So while we will have to be more careful for disclosures outside of TEFRA under the amendment to section 6103(e), the new legislation should not affect our disclosures made as part of a TEFRA audit and litigation.

Thus, we may continue to issue the Form 886-Z under section 6103(h)(4)(A) since this provides an exception to 6103(e). That said, we should nevertheless respect partner privacy to the extent their personal information is not directly relevant to the TEFRA proceeding. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace