CCA 200911023: A suit-period extension did not extend the deadline for a partner's adjustment request

Number
200911023
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Other Requests
Code sections
§ 6227, § 6228, § 6229
Ruling dated
February 4, 2009
Publicly released
March 13, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partner could file a section 6227(d) administrative adjustment request within three years after the partnership filed its return or during an extension of the section 6229(b) assessment period. Only a Form 872-P signed by the tax matters partner or a Form 872-i signed by the individual partner provided the necessary extension. Extending the period for filing suit under section 6228(a)(2) did not extend the section 6229(b) period. The individual partner's request was therefore too late unless that partner had signed Form 872-i, leaving the tax matters partner's request as the only timely one on the stated facts.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the individual partner still file a timely administrative adjustment request after an extension of the period for filing suit?
  • Outcome: Advice given: no, unless the partner separately signed Form 872-i.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6227(b), 6227(d), 6228(a)(2), and 6229(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2009020414562837 Number: 200911023
Release Date: 3/13/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6227.05-00

From: -------------------
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 2:56:29 PM
To: --------------------
Cc: ----------------------------
Subject: RE: 6227(d)

A partner can file a claim under section 6227(d) within 3 years of the date the partnership filed its return or within and extension of the period for assessment under section 6229(b). I.R.C. 6227(b). Only a Form 872-P signed by the TMP or a Form 872-i signed by the partner will extend the statute under section 6229(b) allowing a partner to file a timely AAR under section 6227(d).

Extending the period for filing suit under section 6228(a)(2) does not constitute an extension under section 6229(b). Thus, it appears that it is now too late for your individual partner to file its own AAR unless it signed its own Form 872-i. The TMP filed AAR is the exclusive timely AAR under your facts.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace