CCA 200911016: Assess the disclosure penalty for the return year requiring disclosure

Number
200911016
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Limitations on Assessment and Collection (Barred v. Not Barred)
Code sections
§ 6501, § 6707A
Ruling dated
February 2, 2009
Publicly released
March 13, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel gave an initial view about the year for assessing a section 6707A disclosure penalty. When disclosure was required with a return for a particular tax year, the penalty should be assessed for that return's tax year. This matches the view that the assessment limitation period begins when the return that should have included the disclosure is filed.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: For which tax year should a section 6707A penalty be assessed when disclosure was required with a return?
  • Outcome: Advice given: assess it for the tax year of the return that should have contained the disclosure.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6501 and 6707A.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2009020208362164 Number: 200911016
Release Date: 3/13/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6501.00-00/6707A.01-01

From: ------------------
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 8:36:23 AM
To: -------------------------
Cc: --------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: Assessment of 6707A penalty

I don't recall the issue coming up before.

Where the disclosure was supposed to occur with a return for a particular tax year, I believe the penalty should be assessed for the tax year of the return the disclosure should have been made with. In your example, that would be -------. I think this is best because we view the SOL on assessments as running from the filing of the return with which a disclosure should have been made (when disclosure is required with a return).

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace