CCA 200911006: Separately valued business intangibles can qualify as like-kind property

Number
200911006
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Like Kind Property
Code sections
§ 1031
Ruling dated
February 12, 2009
Publicly released
March 13, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Earlier IRS advice treated trademarks, trade names, newspaper mastheads, and customer accounts as closely related to goodwill and therefore not eligible for section 1031 like-kind treatment. On further consideration, Chief Counsel concluded that the analysis in Newark Morning Ledger applies when deciding whether intangibles are goodwill under the section 1031 regulations. Intangibles that can be separately described and valued apart from goodwill can qualify as like-kind property, and the memorandum said such separation is possible except in rare and unusual situations. The property still must satisfy every other section 1031 requirement, including the nature-and-character rules. The IRS should no longer follow the contrary position in TAM 200602034 and IRS NSAR 20074401F on this issue.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Are separately identifiable trademarks, trade names, mastheads, and customer-based intangibles treated as goodwill that cannot receive section 1031 treatment?
  • Outcome: Advice given: generally no, separately described and valued intangibles can qualify if they meet the other like-kind requirements.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1031; Treas. Reg. § 1.1031(a)-2(c); Newark Morning Ledger Co. v. U.S., 507 U.S. 546 (1993).

Full text (IRS public release)

Office of Chief Counsel
Internal Revenue Service
Memorandum
Number: 200911006
Release Date: 3/13/2009
CC:ITA:4: --------------------
POSTN-104559-09

UILC: 1031.02-00

date: February 12, 2009
to: Joyce L. Sugawara
Media and Entertainment Industry Counsel CC:LM:CTM:LA:2

from: Branch Chief, Branch 4, CC:ITA:4 (Income Tax & Accounting)

subject: Definition of Goodwill for purposes of § 1031 Exchanges

On January 13, 2006, the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting) issued technical advice (TAM 200602034) concluding that the registered trademarks and trade names of a business entity could not be of like kind to the trademarks and trade names of another business entity because they were “closely related to (if not a part of) the goodwill or going concern value of a business.” Under § 1.1031(a)-2(c)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations, the goodwill or going concern value of a business is not of like kind to the goodwill or going concern value of another business.

Using the rationale set forth in TAM 200602034, the Industry Counsel for Media (Large & Mid-Size Business) issued advice on November 2, 2007 (IRS NSAR 20074401F) concluding that (like the trademarks and trade names discussed in TAM 200602034) newspapers' mastheads, advertiser accounts and subscriber accounts were closely related to (if not a part of) the goodwill and going concern value of the newspapers.
Consequently, the exchanged intangibles were not of like kind under § 1.1031(a)-2(c)(2) and the gain from the exchange was not eligible for deferral under § 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. In reaching the conclusion, IRS NSAR 20074401F reasons that Newark Morning Ledger Co. v. U.S., 507 U.S. 546 (1993), which holds that an intangible asset is not goodwill for purposes of the depreciation rules if it can be separately described and valued apart from goodwill, is not relevant to the determination of whether intangibles are of like-kind under § 1031.

POSTN-104559-09
2

Upon further consideration, the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting) has concluded that the analysis of Newark Morning Ledger Co. applies in determining whether intangibles constitute goodwill or going concern value within the meaning of § 1.1031(a)-2(c)(2). Accordingly, intangibles such as trademarks, trade names, mastheads, and customer-based intangibles that can be separately described and valued apart from goodwill qualify as like-kind property under § 1031. In our opinion, except in rare and unusual situations, intangibles such as trademarks, trade names, mastheads, and customer-based intangibles can be separately described and valued apart from goodwill. Of course, to qualify as like-kind property under § 1031, the property must satisfy all other requirements of § 1031 including the nature and character rules of § 1.1031(a)-2(c)(1). Accordingly, the Service should not follow the position in TAM 200602034 and IRS NSAR 20074401F on this issue. We are available to assist should you have questions on whether intangibles are of like kind under
§ 1.1031(a)-2(c)(1).

Please call (202) 622-4920 if you have any questions about this memorandum.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace