CCA 200910049: A missing K-1 dividend entry could be corrected as a clerical error

Number
200910049
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Partner's Return Must Be Consistent with Partnership Return
Code sections
§ 6241
Ruling dated
January 16, 2009
Publicly released
March 6, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised reviewing the entire partnership return rather than only the partner's Schedule K-1. If Form 1065B reported the agreed amount of ordinary dividends but the partnership omitted that item from the K-1, section 6241(b) allowed the IRS to assess the correct amount as a clerical error. No electing large partnership proceeding would be necessary in that situation.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did an ordinary-dividend omission from Schedule K-1 require an electing large partnership proceeding?
  • Outcome: Advice given: no, if Form 1065B reported the agreed amount, the IRS could correct the K-1 omission as a clerical error.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6241(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2009011612064937 Number: 200910049
Release Date: 3/6/2009
Office: -------------
UILC: 6241.00-00

From: --------------------
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 12:06:52 PM
To: --------------------
Cc: -------------------------------
Subject: RE: Partnership Question

You will have to look at the rest of the partnership return, not just at the Schedule K-1 discussed below. If the partnership return reflects ordinary dividends, but neglected to properly report this item on the partner's Schedule K-1, then section 6241(b) allows us to assess the correct amount as a clerical error. No electing large partnership proceeding would be necessary since we apparently agree with the amount of ordinary dividends reported in the body of the Form 1065B.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace