CCA 200910034: Issuing an FPAA best preserved refund and assessment periods

Number
200910034
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Request for Tax Matters Partner
Code sections
§ 6223, § 6227, § 6228, § 6230
Ruling dated
January 6, 2009
Publicly released
March 6, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS had opened a TEFRA proceeding in response to an administrative adjustment request from the tax matters partner. Section 6227(c)(2)(A) allowed the IRS to issue refunds, conduct a proceeding, or take no action, and the IRS had chosen the proceeding. It technically could issue refunds without a final partnership administrative adjustment, but would need extensions to preserve the two-year refund period. Issuing the final adjustment automatically extended the refund period and also extended the assessment period for partners who reported inconsistently. Chief Counsel therefore advised that issuing it was the best policy for processing all refunds and deficiencies from the request.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the IRS issue an FPAA after opening a TEFRA proceeding in response to the tax matters partner's adjustment request?
  • Outcome: Advice given: yes, because it best preserved the periods for refunds and assessments.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6227(c)(2)(A), 6228(a)(2)(D), and 6230(c)-(d); Treas. Reg. § 301.6223(a)-2.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2009010612015137 Number: 200910034
Release Date: 3/6/2009
Office: -------------
UILC: 6227.02-00

From: --------------------
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 12:01:56 PM
To: ---------------------
Cc: -----------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: Closing AAR w/ NBAPs issued

Generally we should issue the FPAA if we opened a TEFRA proceeding in response to an Administrative Adjustment Request filed by the Tax Matters Partner. Section 6227(c)(2)(A) allows us to (1) issue refunds; (2) conduct a TEFRA proceeding; or (3) take no action. We followed option number 2.

Technically, we could just issue the refunds and not issue the FPAA since the regulations relating to NBAPs state that the issuance of an NBAP does not mean that we must ultimately issue an FPAA. Treas. Reg. 301.6223(a)-2. But we would need extensions of the period for issuing a refund by securing the form for extending the 2 year AAR petition period under section 6228(a)(2)(D). Refunds must be issued within this 2 year period (as may be extended). See I.R.C. sec. 6230(d)(2).

Issuing the FPAA has the advantage of automatically extending the refund period for the 150 day petition period plus 2 years under section 6230(c)(2)(B)(ii). It also has the added advantage of extending the period for assessment allowing us to assess any partners who may have filed inconsistently with the partnership return and AAR. So issuing an FPAA is probably the best policy choice, allowing all refunds and deficiencies resulting from the AAR to be processed.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace