CCA 200909050: Partnership adjustments are netted at the partner level

Number
200909050
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Definition of Underpayment
Code sections
§ 6664
Ruling dated
December 9, 2008
Publicly released
February 27, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel explained why adjustments from multiple partnerships are netted at the partner level when calculating an underpayment. Treasury Regulation section 1.6664-2 compares the tax that should have been shown with the tax actually shown, producing one underpayment figure. Whether the penalty applies at the partnership level then matters under the ordering rules in section 1.6664-3. Because the penalty had already been determined to apply, the related underpayment would not be removed before calculating the penalty.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How are adjustments from multiple partnerships reflected in a partner's underpayment and penalty calculation?
  • Outcome: Advice given: net the adjustments at the partner level, then apply the ordering rules without removing adjustments already determined to be penalized.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.6664-2 and 1.6664-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2008120913551007 Number: 200909050
Release Date: 2/27/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6664.01-00

From: ------------------
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:55:12 PM
To: ------------------------
Cc: ----------------------------------------
Subject: RE: TEFRA (adjustment netting question) ---------

The authority for ------ statement that partnership adjustments from multiple partnerships are netted together at the partner level is found indirectly in the calculation of the underpayment in Treas. Reg.
§ 1.6664-2. The calculation compares the amount of tax that should have been shown (as defined in the regulations) with the amount of tax actually shown (as defined in the regulations) to determine the underpayment (the difference between the two). The determination of the applicability of the penalty at the partnership level becomes relevant in applying the ordering rules of Treas. Reg. § 1.6664-3. Because the penalty has already been determined to apply, any underpayment attributable to those adjustments will not be subtracted out prior to applying the penalty. Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace